|
|
|
 there is no such thing as too many parts or useless parts, only parts you dont need yet. - Cuog [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| there is no such thing as too many parts or useless parts, only parts you dont need yet. - Cuog [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#7
27-12-2008, 09:49
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Programs for the new FRC platform
If you have a LabVIEW expert, go with LabVIEW. If you have a C/C++ expert, go with C++. If your expert would end up dominating and not allowing the kids to program, go against their strength.
If you don't have a mentor expert, and you truly have a blank slate to work from, I would personally go with LabVIEW. I've stumbled through teaching C++ and LabVIEW (I'm not an expert in either), and I've found that people completely new to programming pick up LabVIEW quicker. However, that is just anecdotal - I'm sure the pendulum swings both ways. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New FTC Platform | StarGazer | VEX | 186 | 02-05-2008 14:19 |
| Rules of Thumb for New posters and FRC Participants | Al Skierkiewicz | General Forum | 0 | 08-02-2008 23:33 |
| Spoiler: Could this be the new software for the FRC 2006? | Chris_Elston | Rumor Mill | 20 | 21-11-2005 14:14 |
Threaded Mode