|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sounds about right
Posted by Chris Hibner at 2/5/2001 4:34 PM EST
Coach on team #308, Walled Lake Monster, from Walled Lake Schools and TRW Automotive Electronics. In Reply to: You first please... Posted by Joe Johnson on 2/4/2001 7:28 PM EST: : What would teams think of this proposal (assuming the : rules don't spell it out yet): : Re-rank all the alliances that make it through the : quarter finals (a.k.a. the group champions) based on : their highest score in the quarter finals. Then have : Seed #1 play Seed #4 and Seed #2 play Seed #3. Have : the higher ranked team go first in the semi-finals. In : the Finals, have the alliance that scored highest in : the Semi-Finals go first. : What do you think? : Joe J. I think this is probably the best way to do it. I'm pretty sure they'll end up doing this. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Do all three team have to play in finals??? | Scott358 | Rules/Strategy | 8 | 16-03-2003 11:00 |
| getting picked for finals... | archiver | 2001 | 11 | 24-06-2002 02:55 |
| Thoughts on this years competition... | archiver | 2001 | 3 | 24-06-2002 01:11 |
| Are the Semis & Finals worth playing? | archiver | 2001 | 8 | 24-06-2002 00:15 |
| dead robot in the finals? | srawls | Rules/Strategy | 2 | 24-03-2002 14:44 |