Go to Post EXPERIMENT in the off season! - DonRotolo [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #31   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2009, 13:12
acdcfan259's Avatar
acdcfan259 acdcfan259 is offline
Brainssss....
AKA: Jake Carroll
FRC #1027 (Mechatronic Maniacs)
Team Role: Driver
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: West Springfield, MA
Posts: 370
acdcfan259 has a reputation beyond reputeacdcfan259 has a reputation beyond reputeacdcfan259 has a reputation beyond reputeacdcfan259 has a reputation beyond reputeacdcfan259 has a reputation beyond reputeacdcfan259 has a reputation beyond reputeacdcfan259 has a reputation beyond reputeacdcfan259 has a reputation beyond reputeacdcfan259 has a reputation beyond reputeacdcfan259 has a reputation beyond reputeacdcfan259 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to acdcfan259
Re: Anybody really dis-like the game?

Long time since I've posted, wow. I like that they went with something different. As a driver I think it's going to be fun learning how to drive on the new surface. It should be difficult for veteran teams as it breaks from the norm, but easy for newer teams as it's a relatively simple game.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #32   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2009, 13:33
germanystudent's Avatar
germanystudent germanystudent is offline
Trashed and Scattered
AKA: Everett
FRC #2865 (Roboteknix)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Post Falls
Posts: 86
germanystudent has a spectacular aura aboutgermanystudent has a spectacular aura aboutgermanystudent has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via MSN to germanystudent
Re: Anybody really dis-like the game?

i must say this is a pretty good year for us rookies! we have no experience with omni-directionals, or any other fancy drive systems, so this is actually pretty sweet for us. plus living in north Idaho, we're used to driving in icy conditions, so this should be fun!
__________________
Nobody leaves my reality without a note from their mother!
Reply With Quote
  #33   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2009, 13:44
Andrew Schreiber Andrew Schreiber is offline
Joining the 900 Meme Team
FRC #0079
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Misplaced Michigander
Posts: 4,074
Andrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Anybody really dis-like the game?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fred Sayre View Post
I like the game concept a lot. It is new, unique and will be very interesting to see the dynamics of 6 players on this field.

I am a bit worried however, that it will decrease the number of unique designs and limit creativity a bit. The size limitations and drive train limitations makes me think we are going to see a lot of aim high machines with new wheels. It is always a little strange when a robot from a previous year will work pretty well (even if with just small modifications) for a new game.
This is my only concern with this game. Limiting us to the same wheels and not expanding outside the starting box brings back very bad memories of Aim High. I loved Aim High, awesome game, but I had one issue with it, there were a LOT of similar robots. (Yes I know that we could expand in 2006 just not above 60") I fear we will have robots where the drive trains are all the same and that worries me. There is a quote by Ken Patton about when he saw a team moving sideways it was inspiring to him floating around here somewhere. We more than likely WON'T see that this year, we might see something cooler (I hope we do) but I cannot help but worry if this year is stifling creativity.

Concerns about having a TON of the same robots aside this game presents one other concern to me. The robot that is literally a box on wheels can beat the precision engineered robot, to me that is NOT inspiration. To me that says to do the bare minimum because anything else is a waste of resources. Any game where a box on wheels is a viable strategy worries me.

Aside from those worries I almost like the game. I will wait until 2nd week (Kettering District Event) to pass judgement on this game but as of right now it looks interesting. I am seriously hoping my concerns are wrong because this could be one awesome game, it does throw everything we have ever known to the winds and I like that.

Edit: Plus, being a native Michigander who drives a rwd car on ice all the time I can say that driving on this field is gonna be FUN!
__________________




.
Reply With Quote
  #34   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2009, 13:46
JaneYoung JaneYoung is offline
Onward through the fog.
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Austin, TX USA
Posts: 5,996
JaneYoung has a reputation beyond reputeJaneYoung has a reputation beyond reputeJaneYoung has a reputation beyond reputeJaneYoung has a reputation beyond reputeJaneYoung has a reputation beyond reputeJaneYoung has a reputation beyond reputeJaneYoung has a reputation beyond reputeJaneYoung has a reputation beyond reputeJaneYoung has a reputation beyond reputeJaneYoung has a reputation beyond reputeJaneYoung has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Anybody really dis-like the game?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Betty_Krocker View Post
I semi dislike it purely from a driving stand point. Last year it was tough as crap. I am also from NY but reside in VA where nobody (or next to nobody) has ever seen snow/ice let alone driven on it. It is going to be really hard to tech someone how to drive effictively on an ice like surface in less than 6 weeks. I do like challenges though so Im up for anything...
Here in Austin, when it rains after a long dry spell, the conditions are very hazardous because of the oil slick on the roads. We see a lot of accidents on rainy days because of those conditions and the drivers' careless disregard for them.

It is a challenge but some common sense can be applied as well.
__________________
Excellence is contagious. ~ Andy Baker, President, AndyMark, Inc. and Woodie Flowers Award 2003

Character cannot be developed in ease and quiet. Only through experience of trial and suffering can the soul be strengthened, ambition inspired, and success achieved.
~ Helen Keller
(1880-1968)
Reply With Quote
  #35   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2009, 13:59
Katie_UPS's Avatar
Katie_UPS Katie_UPS is offline
Registered User
AKA: Katie Widen
no team
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Wisconsinite lost in Texas
Posts: 957
Katie_UPS has a reputation beyond reputeKatie_UPS has a reputation beyond reputeKatie_UPS has a reputation beyond reputeKatie_UPS has a reputation beyond reputeKatie_UPS has a reputation beyond reputeKatie_UPS has a reputation beyond reputeKatie_UPS has a reputation beyond reputeKatie_UPS has a reputation beyond reputeKatie_UPS has a reputation beyond reputeKatie_UPS has a reputation beyond reputeKatie_UPS has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Anybody really dis-like the game?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Schreiber View Post
.

Concerns about having a TON of the same robots aside this game presents one other concern to me. The robot that is literally a box on wheels can beat the precision engineered robot, to me that is NOT inspiration. To me that says to do the bare minimum because anything else is a waste of resources. Any game where a box on wheels is a viable strategy worries me.
I think that there is a purpose for that.

The last few years, a box bot could only score a few points, where now it can do a little bit more. This makes things easier on teams that either don't have the experience or resources. Remember, the economy limits sponsors...
Reply With Quote
  #36   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2009, 14:33
Andrew Schreiber Andrew Schreiber is offline
Joining the 900 Meme Team
FRC #0079
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Misplaced Michigander
Posts: 4,074
Andrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Anybody really dis-like the game?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Katie_UPS View Post
I think that there is a purpose for that.

The last few years, a box bot could only score a few points, where now it can do a little bit more. This makes things easier on teams that either don't have the experience or resources. Remember, the economy limits sponsors...
I understand that but if I put a box on wheels out I wouldn't be too inspired by it. I would be inspired by seeing 1114 dominate the field last year though. Frankly I am sick of the argument that FIRST has to cater to the low resource teams and make them equal to the great teams out there. FIRST is an organization for us to SHINE. <G14> is little more than an attack on great teams, it is saying that if you are an elite team against a team that can barely move you are to be penalized for success. Apparently FIRST doesn't want teams to be performing at their best.

And you can do a lot of pretty awesome stuff using nothing more than some hand tools.
__________________




.
Reply With Quote
  #37   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2009, 14:50
dtengineering's Avatar
dtengineering dtengineering is offline
Teaching Teachers to Teach Tech
AKA: Jason Brett
no team (British Columbia FRC teams)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,833
dtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Anybody really dis-like the game?

I'm intrigued by the game. My experience has been that it isn't the game itself that makes things fun and exciting, but rather what the teams do with it. The only year I came away from kickoff going "Yeah.... this is the coolest game EVER" was in '06. I never thought FIRST would let us SHOOT things! I'm not worried about seeing a lot of robots "the same" despite the size restrictions. When we had similar size limits in 06 at the two regionals I attended that year there was a huge degree of variety in the robots, well illustrated in the "Behind the Design" book from that season.

I don't think that teams who are from icy parts of the world will have any advantage over those from sunny places. Driving a robot is completely different from driving a car, not least in the sense that you don't have a "seat of the pants" feel for what your machine is doing.

What I AM concerned about is the availability of the Orbit Balls. I expect FIRST will be providing information on where they may be obtained, because it would be too ironic if FIRST were to ignore the COTS rules that teams have to follow...

Jason

P.S. One further concern is that the robot, at the end of the season, might not be a great demo robot because the first thing everyone will wonder is "why didn't they use good wheels?" Sure, lots of people will ask that and get the answer and learn about how that affected the design, but most will probably walk off thinking "Huh... I could do better than THAT."

P.P.S. And as for G14 being an attack on "Great Teams"... I am sure the truly Great teams will be able to take it in stride and still manage to shine. I'm not sure any team is shown at their "best" when they completely blow out a weak opposing alliance.

Last edited by dtengineering : 04-01-2009 at 14:57.
Reply With Quote
  #38   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2009, 15:03
thefro526's Avatar
thefro526 thefro526 is offline
Mentor for Hire.
AKA: Dustin Benedict
no team (EWCP, MAR, FRC 708)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,599
thefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond reputethefro526 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to thefro526 Send a message via MSN to thefro526
Re: Anybody really dis-like the game?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Akash Rastogi View Post
I'd also watch for 816 at NJ...their driver is a known drifter
Shhhhhhh.......

I like and dislike this game. I really don't like the lack of a definite autonomous mode/ autonomous objective. I think it'll be an OK game if it's played well but then again I fear we'll see a lot of matches with out of control robots going all over the field not scoring.
__________________
-Dustin Benedict
2005-2012 - Student & Mentor FRC 816
2012-2014 - Technical Mentor, 2014 Drive Coach FRC 341
Current - Mentor FRC 2729, FRC 708
Reply With Quote
  #39   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2009, 15:30
Daniel_LaFleur's Avatar
Daniel_LaFleur Daniel_LaFleur is offline
Mad Scientist
AKA: Me
FRC #2040 (DERT)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 1,976
Daniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via MSN to Daniel_LaFleur
Re: Anybody really dis-like the game?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Schreiber View Post
I understand that but if I put a box on wheels out I wouldn't be too inspired by it. I would be inspired by seeing 1114 dominate the field last year though. Frankly I am sick of the argument that FIRST has to cater to the low resource teams and make them equal to the great teams out there. FIRST is an organization for us to SHINE. <G14> is little more than an attack on great teams, it is saying that if you are an elite team against a team that can barely move you are to be penalized for success. Apparently FIRST doesn't want teams to be performing at their best.

And you can do a lot of pretty awesome stuff using nothing more than some hand tools.
Andrew,

I have to disagree with you here.

The game is not won with the best looking machine, nor the best machined machine, not the team with the most money, nor the team with the most mentors.

The game is won by the teams that best understand.
They understand the game, They understand their own machining capabilities, and they only build into their machine what is really required.

A box on wheels will never beat 1114 unless they completely understand themselves, their strategy, and the game at hand. And if they do, then I'll bet that there is a lot more than a box on wheels there if you look real close.

JMHO
__________________
___________________
"We are not now that strength which in old days moved earth and heaven; that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts, Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield. "
- Tennyson, Ulysses
Reply With Quote
  #40   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2009, 15:32
Mike Schreiber's Avatar
Mike Schreiber Mike Schreiber is offline
Registered User
FRC #0067 (The HOT Team)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Milford, Michigan
Posts: 484
Mike Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeMike Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeMike Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeMike Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeMike Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeMike Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeMike Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeMike Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeMike Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeMike Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeMike Schreiber has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Anybody really dis-like the game?

My Likes:
-The closest thing we will get to a water game.
-It's different and challenging which does give rookies a chance.
-The proven preplanned drive train isn't as effective.
-The game combines the shooting/open field aspect of '06 with the goals from '04 (the trailers).
-Very strategic play.

My Dislikes:
-The rules are VERY limiting to strategy.
-There is no objective on the field other than other robots.
-Rookie teams who can't move will cripple their alliance as they are a sitting trailer.
-G14 is a punishment and despite the fact that it "evens the field" it says to teams "don't do your best and show how good you are." IMO it will have little to no effect on any match because I don't believe that all 4 super cells will be used, but it is a psychological deterrent.
-FIRST picked a game piece that is no longer in production and is (so far) not providing us with any means of obtaining them.
-The human player is a GIANT part of scoring and takes away from the impact of the actual robot performance. Who had their human player practice the most instead of perfecting their machine?
-My biggest problem with the game is the renaming of every position. The names are childish and impossible to remember especially if they are to change it every year. What is the difference between the Coach and the Commander? and how is the payload specialist any different than human player? I understand why they theme FLL, but applying the same concepts to 9 year olds and adults just seems ridiculous.


+$0.02
__________________
Mike Schreiber

Kettering University ('09-'13) University of Michigan ('14-'18?)
FLL ('01-'02), FRC Team 27 ('06-'09), Team 397 ('10), Team 3450/314 ('11), Team 67 ('14-'??)

Last edited by Mike Schreiber : 04-01-2009 at 15:33. Reason: Grammar
Reply With Quote
  #41   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2009, 15:41
Lil' Lavery Lil' Lavery is offline
TSIMFD
AKA: Sean Lavery
FRC #1712 (DAWGMA)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 6,643
Lil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Lil' Lavery
Re: Anybody really dis-like the game?

With the exception of the highest levels of play, this game will be boring. And all games are exciting when played by the best.

The floor/wheels will make this game very slow and cumbersome. The acceleration will be dramatically slower, and it will be hard to perform well for a vast majority of teams.
This is compounded by <G14> making many teams lay off the pressure and/or score for oppoenents.

This will likely be the worst game since I've started participatin in 2003. Rather than "levellin the playing field," they simply handicapped everyone. It will take great strides of engineering to make bots that would be only mediocre by previous year's standards.
__________________
Being correct doesn't mean you don't have to explain yourself.
Reply With Quote
  #42   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2009, 16:00
Unsung FIRST Hero
RoboMom RoboMom is offline
people expediter on Team Kluge
AKA: Jenny Beatty, no relation
no team (they are all my teams)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 3,067
RoboMom has a reputation beyond reputeRoboMom has a reputation beyond reputeRoboMom has a reputation beyond reputeRoboMom has a reputation beyond reputeRoboMom has a reputation beyond reputeRoboMom has a reputation beyond reputeRoboMom has a reputation beyond reputeRoboMom has a reputation beyond reputeRoboMom has a reputation beyond reputeRoboMom has a reputation beyond reputeRoboMom has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Anybody really dis-like the game?

Quote:
Originally Posted by dtengineering View Post

P.S. One further concern is that the robot, at the end of the season, might not be a great demo robot because the first thing everyone will wonder is "why didn't they use good wheels?" Sure, lots of people will ask that and get the answer and learn about how that affected the design, but most will probably walk off thinking "Huh... I could do better than THAT."
Those are the details running through my tired brain at kickoff each year. While everyone else is thinking about robot design, I'm thinking "Ok, how will this game be demonstrated to an audience of educators, potential sponsors, etc after April outside in tents, or in conference rooms? What stuff will need to be hauled around to demo? How can I explain this game in a minute or less, while sitting in the stands with some VIP or prospective mentor? How easy are the game pieces to acquire?
New this year is "that flooring looks pretty important." I do have some concerns about teams carrying robots on/off the field. And there goes the dancing...
And most importantly, "what are my earrings going to look like?" http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/photos/32129

Only have the earring thing answered so far...
__________________
Co-Founder of NEMO (Non-Engineering Mentor Organization) www.firstnemo.org
Volunteer Director, STEMaction, Inc. www.stemaction.org
FIRST Senior Mentor: Nov. 2004 to June 2009: "Experience is that marvelous thing that enables you to recognize a mistake when you make it again"
This is How I Work: http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/papers/2862

Last edited by RoboMom : 04-01-2009 at 17:02.
Reply With Quote
  #43   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2009, 16:04
robodude03's Avatar
robodude03 robodude03 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Rene Haro
FRC #1538 (The Holy Cows)
Team Role: Tactician
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Valencia
Posts: 233
robodude03 has a reputation beyond reputerobodude03 has a reputation beyond reputerobodude03 has a reputation beyond reputerobodude03 has a reputation beyond reputerobodude03 has a reputation beyond reputerobodude03 has a reputation beyond reputerobodude03 has a reputation beyond reputerobodude03 has a reputation beyond reputerobodude03 has a reputation beyond reputerobodude03 has a reputation beyond reputerobodude03 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Anybody really dis-like the game?

Quote:
Originally Posted by neoshaakti View Post
I think this game is pretty cool
we're all in the same position, so all veteran teams have to rethink their "universal" drivetrains
and plus, it has a basketball element to it
I think that is exactly what makes the game interesting. It puts both rookies and veterans on the same level in terms of driving. It will take a lot of practice to get used to the new environment.
__________________
Team 1538 - The Holy Cows
2015 Championships - Quality Award sponsored by Motorola
2014 Championships - Media and Technology Innovation Award
2013 Championships - Chairmain's Award Winner and Newton Finalists w/ 217 & 1986

2013 to Present - 1538 Mentor (Digital Media/Strategy)
2004 to 2012 - 399 Mentor/Coach
2000 to 2004 - 399 Driver
Reply With Quote
  #44   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2009, 16:37
Dan2081's Avatar
Dan2081 Dan2081 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Dan
FRC #2081 (Icarus)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Peoria, Illinois
Posts: 84
Dan2081 is a splendid one to beholdDan2081 is a splendid one to beholdDan2081 is a splendid one to beholdDan2081 is a splendid one to beholdDan2081 is a splendid one to beholdDan2081 is a splendid one to beholdDan2081 is a splendid one to beholdDan2081 is a splendid one to behold
Re: Anybody really dis-like the game?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel_LaFleur View Post
Andrew,

I have to disagree with you here.

The game is not won with the best looking machine, nor the best machined machine, not the team with the most money, nor the team with the most mentors.

The game is won by the teams that best understand.
They understand the game, They understand their own machining capabilities, and they only build into their machine what is really required.

A box on wheels will never beat 1114 unless they completely understand themselves, their strategy, and the game at hand. And if they do, then I'll bet that there is a lot more than a box on wheels there if you look real close.

JMHO



I don't think FIRST shoudl have gone to even out the playing field either... From experience I can say that people join FIRST because they see some cool robot doing amazing functions, performing in ways unseen before. With Lunacy this year, the actual functionality of the robot will be equal if not less of an effect of the human players throwing balls..

This game doesn't allow for enough creativity imo; however I am still looking forward to competition!!!
__________________
09 IRI #7seed and Semifinalists
09 BMR GM Industrial Design
08 BMR Engineering Inspiration
08 Archimedes #5 seed
07 BMR Rookie All-Star
Reply With Quote
  #45   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2009, 17:29
Katy's Avatar
Katy Katy is offline
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
no team
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: CA
Posts: 257
Katy has a reputation beyond reputeKaty has a reputation beyond reputeKaty has a reputation beyond reputeKaty has a reputation beyond reputeKaty has a reputation beyond reputeKaty has a reputation beyond reputeKaty has a reputation beyond reputeKaty has a reputation beyond reputeKaty has a reputation beyond reputeKaty has a reputation beyond reputeKaty has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Katy Send a message via MSN to Katy
Re: Anybody really dis-like the game?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Schreiber View Post
The robot that is literally a box on wheels can beat the precision engineered robot, to me that is NOT inspiration. To me that says to do the bare minimum because anything else is a waste of resources. Any game where a box on wheels is a viable strategy worries me.
Any team that can pour resources onto a machine and have it come out nothing better than a box on wheels worries me! If your machine does the same things as a box on wheels but with precision mill-work and expensive sensors and the whole thing is coated in lexan just for the giggles: congratulations that WAS a waste of resources. You want to talk about entrepreneurship? You want to talk about real-life applications? A check book is not an appropriate brute force tactic in real life, and because of that fact it is reasonable to propose that it probably shouldn't be considered one in FIRST.

This is pretty much about the minimums you design your bot for. A robox is a pretty solid minimum. If you design your robot in the abstract of "how much better does our design do the task at hand than showing up to the match with only a human player" that is a very low minimum. A slightly better minimum is "how much better does our design do at the task at hand than showing up with a robox?" Higher still would be "what will an average team do at the competition and how can we blow that out of the water?" and for the truly ambitious "what will a good team be able to do and how can we top that?" What you shoot for depends a whole lot on what your team feels ready to take on, but if you take on a low minimum threshold for what you consider to be acceptable performance in your design, don't be so shocked when your robot works no better than you designed it to.

You're totally right! A box has a very high performance this game as a minimum. I guess that means it is probably the lowest benchmark you can safely use when designing a good bot because you can already see how many teams are going to try it.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
i am really bored and fell like making things videoguy Chit-Chat 0 09-03-2007 19:22
What it's really like....... Tri_Lam Rules/Strategy 2 06-03-2007 23:02
What teams would you really like to meet at a FIRST event? ZPaul General Forum 107 23-07-2006 02:26
No really, what do you think the game will be like? Joe Matt General Forum 27 06-01-2004 10:12
Is it really just a game? ThePaleOne Chit-Chat 0 13-01-2003 01:09


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:18.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi