|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Rule clarification - trailer recessed
i don't remember the rule number right off the top of my head, but there is one that states the trailer hitch must be mounted on an outside edge of the robot, not inside it
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Rule clarification - trailer recessed
There is a rule that says that the trailer must be able to swing freely at all times. It sounds like with that idea, it would not be able to swing freely.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Rule clarification - trailer recessed
You could possibly have a tolerance of an inch or so of swinging (maybe?)
Like not all the way touching but almost. That way it would be technically swining, but also helps in that it only swings a small ammount.... |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Rule clarification - trailer recessed
Quote:
corporalchee: that remains to be clarified by the GDC, because that would also technically be an 'inside' edge |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Rule clarification - trailer recessed
If your robot was U shaped than that "inside" edge would be an outside edge by my thinking.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Rule clarification - trailer recessed
But the trailer would then be "touching" an edge other than the outside edge. And the trailer seems to be about as long as the robot's maximum dimensions, so it doesn't seem to be possible.
Methinks clarification will come with the first update on this rule. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Rule clarification - trailer recessed
Hence the clarification requirement. Outside edge should have a solid definition
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Rule clarification - trailer recessed
Outside edge is well defined under the Bumper rules (last paragraph of Page 3 on the Robot Section). It considers this to bee the POLYGON connecting the outer most vertices. Therefore a robot in a C shape you have the Outside edge of a backwards D
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Rule clarification - trailer recessed
Ok Thank's woody. That to me more or less makes this idea unworkable.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Rule clarification - trailer recessed
this is confusing to me C or D ? what
Edit -never mind... i get it now... took me a second |
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Rule clarification - trailer recessed
Quote:
Quote:
Thus, the GDC has to be asked in the Forum (when it opens) what "outer edge" in <R18> means. I suspect their answer will be, "On the bumper perimeter" - but we don't know that now. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Rule clarification - trailer recessed
It probably wouldn't work even if "outer ege" were to include the inside of a U-shaped robot. Consider this: the last part of R11: The Bumper perimiter may extend up to but cannot exceed the maximum robot volume constraints defined in Rule R11. From what this says, if the inside edges of a U-shaped bot have to have bumpers too, most likely the perimeter wouldn't sufficiently cover them.
|
|
#13
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Rule clarification - trailer recessed
Quote:
Last edited by GaryVoshol : 04-01-2009 at 19:50. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Rule clarification - trailer recessed
If the trailer hitch was included in the bumper perimeter, then the hitch would need to be recessed.
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Rule clarification - trailer recessed
My team had the same idea, so thanks for the rule clarification.
Although I had said even without a rule defining this, it seems to be a little (LOT) bit like lawering the rules... For no other reason, I would avoid against this since it isn't exactly in the spirit of FIRST... imho. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Lap Indicator Rule <R18> Clarification | t-raum | General Forum | 1 | 28-01-2008 11:04 |
| New rule Clarification changes plans | BoyWithCape195 | General Forum | 83 | 07-02-2006 20:34 |
| [OCCRA]: Rule Clarification | Viking(redneck) | OCCRA | 3 | 24-11-2004 09:41 |
| Very Important Rule Clarification!!! | Mr. Mac | OCCRA | 0 | 17-10-2002 23:35 |