Go to Post It's really quite amazing what people will find time to talk about in the month before kickoff. - Ekcrbe [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #46   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2009, 17:48
screw_in_my_arm's Avatar
screw_in_my_arm screw_in_my_arm is offline
Overlord of wiring
FRC #2546 (The Electric Sheep)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 4
screw_in_my_arm is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Anybody really dis-like the game?

Im kinda on the fence about this game. I think they could have done a little more, to make it more exciting. I do like the idea that we can pin other bots, and ramming is allowed. I havent really read all the rules yet, so if im wrong about the ramming, could somebody clear that up. Anyway, I guess i just have to wait till the play day to see how it all plays out. It will be interesting. Knowing my luck though, it will probably snow here in Baltimore, and I wont be able to go to the play day
Reply With Quote
  #47   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2009, 18:15
Drwurm's Avatar
Drwurm Drwurm is offline
Electrical Alumni
AKA: Jason "Powercoach" Osmann
FRC #0294 (Beach Cities Robotics)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 151
Drwurm is a glorious beacon of lightDrwurm is a glorious beacon of lightDrwurm is a glorious beacon of lightDrwurm is a glorious beacon of lightDrwurm is a glorious beacon of light
Send a message via AIM to Drwurm
Re: Anybody really dis-like the game?

Quote:
Originally Posted by usbcd36 View Post
I love the game, but not the game theme, which seems a little more childish than the past few.
This is one of my main complaints too. Obviously it's not a huge deal, but this game seems to have more of an FLL-style theme than past games. Now there's nothing wrong with FLL for its age group, but I would like to think FRC is a little more mature.

The shared resources is always a welcome competitive aspect to a game which should provide some great excitement as teams scramble and claw for the remaining balls as time runs down. The only other gripe I really have is the lack of a secondary goal that would require the use of a specialized manipulator. I've always enjoyed games that allow for big, diverse manipulators, which is why I ended up loving last year's game despite my initial wariness. I'm sure Lunacy will grow on me in the coming time, especially as I start to see pre-ship robot videos surface on youtube.
__________________
Electrical Engineer (in training)

Also grows carnivorous plants.

BEACH CITIES ROBOTICS:
2007 FTC "Quad Quandary" World Champions
Reply With Quote
  #48   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2009, 18:24
Tetraman's Avatar
Tetraman Tetraman is offline
FIRST on my mind
AKA: Evan Raitt
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Manchester, NH
Posts: 1,322
Tetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond reputeTetraman has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Anybody really dis-like the game?

I've complained at 2007, and while I still never liked Rackn' Roll, I have to admit that it was not a failure. I was also very much against last year's game to begin, but once the regionals started I fell in love with it.

My first reaction to Lunacy was not that positive...but the more I get involved with it, the more I can't wait to see competition.

The reason why I like it, is probably because it reminds me of my rookie year's game Zone Zeal, and there is nothing better then reliving one's FIRST past.
__________________
"For every great theory about design, there is a better and contradictory theory about design. And don't let the irony of that escape you."
Reply With Quote
  #49   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2009, 18:25
Danny McC's Avatar
Danny McC Danny McC is offline
Taking one home in '09.
AKA: Danny McCanney
FRC #0816 (The WesTech Anomaly)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 775
Danny McC has a brilliant futureDanny McC has a brilliant futureDanny McC has a brilliant futureDanny McC has a brilliant futureDanny McC has a brilliant futureDanny McC has a brilliant futureDanny McC has a brilliant futureDanny McC has a brilliant futureDanny McC has a brilliant futureDanny McC has a brilliant futureDanny McC has a brilliant future
Send a message via AIM to Danny McC Send a message via MSN to Danny McC
Re: Anybody really dis-like the game?

Hmm I have not really decided yet wether I like this game or not. I usually do that when it actually comes time for the competitions. Because I start out saying hmmm this isnt gonna be fun but than by the end of the competitions I realize how fun the game actually is. I think that this game has a lot of potential to be fun.
Reply With Quote
  #50   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2009, 18:36
Lodyev Lodyev is offline
Registered User
AKA: Dylan Adams
FRC #0422 (Mech Tech Dragons)
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Richmond, Va
Posts: 15
Lodyev is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via AIM to Lodyev Send a message via MSN to Lodyev Send a message via Yahoo to Lodyev
Re: Anybody really dis-like the game?

Poor Royal Assault (356), we feel for them as fellow users of custom wheels.
Hahaha
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #51   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2009, 19:35
Akash Rastogi Akash Rastogi is offline
Jim Zondag is my Spirit Animal
FRC #2170 (Titanium Tomahawks)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Manchester, Connecticut
Posts: 7,003
Akash Rastogi has a reputation beyond reputeAkash Rastogi has a reputation beyond reputeAkash Rastogi has a reputation beyond reputeAkash Rastogi has a reputation beyond reputeAkash Rastogi has a reputation beyond reputeAkash Rastogi has a reputation beyond reputeAkash Rastogi has a reputation beyond reputeAkash Rastogi has a reputation beyond reputeAkash Rastogi has a reputation beyond reputeAkash Rastogi has a reputation beyond reputeAkash Rastogi has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Anybody really dis-like the game?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lodyev View Post
Poor Royal Assault (356), we feel for them as fellow users of custom wheels.
Hahaha
*clears throat* 357 *clears throat*
__________________
My posts and opinions do not necessarily reflect those of my affiliated team.
['16-'xx]: Mentor FRC 2170 | ['11-'13]: Co-Founder/Mentor FRC 3929 | ['06-'10]: Student FRC 11 - MORT | ['08-'12]: Founder - EWCP (OG)
Reply With Quote
  #52   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2009, 20:22
1t5h1e1o's Avatar
1t5h1e1o 1t5h1e1o is offline
Das boot.
AKA: Theo Matt
FRC #1511 (Rolling Thunder)
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: May 2007
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Penfield, New York
Posts: 60
1t5h1e1o is a jewel in the rough1t5h1e1o is a jewel in the rough1t5h1e1o is a jewel in the rough
Send a message via AIM to 1t5h1e1o
Re: Anybody really dis-like the game?

My views towards Lunacy have changed vastly.

While watching the animation and for the rest of Saturday I flat-out hated it. I hated the simplicity and the design restrictions. The only thing that seemed cool was the drifting and no ramming/pinning penalties.

One day later while designing the robot and after sleeping on it I am really looking forward to it. I think that it will still be a good game to watch/play and that there will still be plenty of great/cool robot designs out there despite the limitations.

I do however have one thing to say as a team that hosts a pre-ship scrimmage:

120 Wild Time Orbit Balls ................ ~$1200

24'X50' of Regolith ................... ~$1300

Knowing that you will most likely never need these again....... Priceless
__________________
2010 FLR Engineering Inspiration Winner, 2010 Boston Chairman's & Coopertition Winners!
2009 FLR Entrepreneurship Winner; 2009 Chesapeake Website, Imagery, & Chairman's Winners!!!!
2008 FLR Engineering Inspiration Winner; 2008 Philly Safety & Imagery Winners
2007 FLR Chairman's Winner!!! 2007 Boston Spirit & Website Winners
Record on the Field: (2008-2010) 61-45-3
Reply With Quote
  #53   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2009, 20:47
Josh Goodman's Avatar
Josh Goodman Josh Goodman is offline
The Voice of WNY
FRC #1511 (Rolling Thunder)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Penfield, NY
Posts: 838
Josh Goodman has a reputation beyond reputeJosh Goodman has a reputation beyond reputeJosh Goodman has a reputation beyond reputeJosh Goodman has a reputation beyond reputeJosh Goodman has a reputation beyond reputeJosh Goodman has a reputation beyond reputeJosh Goodman has a reputation beyond reputeJosh Goodman has a reputation beyond reputeJosh Goodman has a reputation beyond reputeJosh Goodman has a reputation beyond reputeJosh Goodman has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Anybody really dis-like the game?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1t5h1e1o View Post

Knowing that you will most likely never need these again....... Priceless
I believe Theo the word used to describe that is PAINFUL.
__________________
Josh Goodman
Mentor and Volunteer
Team 1511: Rolling Thunder
joshuapgoodman@gmail.com
Reply With Quote
  #54   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2009, 20:49
notaPINKtruck's Avatar
notaPINKtruck notaPINKtruck is offline
Registered User
AKA: Ryan Julian
FRC #0233 (The Pink Team)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 73
notaPINKtruck is a splendid one to beholdnotaPINKtruck is a splendid one to beholdnotaPINKtruck is a splendid one to beholdnotaPINKtruck is a splendid one to beholdnotaPINKtruck is a splendid one to beholdnotaPINKtruck is a splendid one to beholdnotaPINKtruck is a splendid one to behold
Send a message via AIM to notaPINKtruck
Re: Anybody really dis-like the game?

I think the people who are decrying this year's titles like "commander" and "mission specialist" as "too immature for us adults" need to stop taking themselves so seriously.

One
, FRC is designed for pre-college students so nobody playing the game can consider themselves a legal adult.

Second
, these names are ripped directly from the titles used for NASA astronauts (and they don't seem to mind them).

Third, if the idea is to simulate a real-world challenge (such as moving/mining on the moon, which thousands of "real" engineering are currently working on), then its appropriate to used the correct vocabulary to extend the metaphor.

Fourth (and MOST importantly), I think you'll find that so-called "adults" who are so full of themselves as to think they're "above" a little goofyness like special titles aren't much fun to be around anyway.

In fact, I think the only real criticisms could be that (1) it makes the game less accessible to the general public (since they have to learn vocabulary), and (2) at first it's harder to talk about with teammates (though that will fade quickly).

My $0.02
__________________

Rockledge HS/Cocoa Beach HS & NASA Kennedy Space Center
Team 233: "The PINK Team"


Reply With Quote
  #55   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2009, 21:01
RogerHebert's Avatar
RogerHebert RogerHebert is offline
Registered User
FRC #0811 (Cardinals)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: May 2008
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: merrimack nh
Posts: 15
RogerHebert is on a distinguished road
Re: Anybody really dis-like the game?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Schreiber View Post
<G14> is little more than an attack on great teams, it is saying that if you are an elite team against a team that can barely move you are to be penalized for success. Apparently FIRST doesn't want teams to be performing at their best.
I wouldn't worry too much about it. IMO, worst case scenario: Incredible teams and their machines will always be chosen as alliance partners in the end, regardless of whether they managed to finesse the scores in every match. Scouting generally takes those things into account.
Reply With Quote
  #56   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2009, 21:09
yoshibrock's Avatar
yoshibrock yoshibrock is offline
Mechanical Magician
AKA: Brock
FRC #0540 (Talon)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Glen Allen, Virginia
Posts: 71
yoshibrock will become famous soon enoughyoshibrock will become famous soon enough
Send a message via AIM to yoshibrock
Re: Anybody really dis-like the game?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Schreiber View Post
I understand that but if I put a box on wheels out I wouldn't be too inspired by it. I would be inspired by seeing 1114 dominate the field last year though. Frankly I am sick of the argument that FIRST has to cater to the low resource teams and make them equal to the great teams out there. FIRST is an organization for us to SHINE. <G14> is little more than an attack on great teams, it is saying that if you are an elite team against a team that can barely move you are to be penalized for success. Apparently FIRST doesn't want teams to be performing at their best.

And you can do a lot of pretty awesome stuff using nothing more than some hand tools.
I agree with you about <G14>. I was wondering if anyone else noticed the correlation between it and Kamen's speech. Both seem/seemed to have very subtle socialist overtones....
I can easily see discussion of this rule turning into political debate as the season progresses
__________________
There is no charge for awesomeness.
Am I a hero? I really can't say, but yes.
Reply With Quote
  #57   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2009, 23:28
Andrew Schreiber Andrew Schreiber is offline
Joining the 900 Meme Team
FRC #0079
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Misplaced Michigander
Posts: 4,074
Andrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Anybody really dis-like the game?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Katy View Post
Any team that can pour resources onto a machine and have it come out nothing better than a box on wheels worries me! If your machine does the same things as a box on wheels but with precision mill-work and expensive sensors and the whole thing is coated in lexan just for the giggles: congratulations that WAS a waste of resources. You want to talk about entrepreneurship? You want to talk about real-life applications? A check book is not an appropriate brute force tactic in real life, and because of that fact it is reasonable to propose that it probably shouldn't be considered one in FIRST.

This is pretty much about the minimums you design your bot for. A robox is a pretty solid minimum. If you design your robot in the abstract of "how much better does our design do the task at hand than showing up to the match with only a human player" that is a very low minimum. A slightly better minimum is "how much better does our design do at the task at hand than showing up with a robox?" Higher still would be "what will an average team do at the competition and how can we blow that out of the water?" and for the truly ambitious "what will a good team be able to do and how can we top that?" What you shoot for depends a whole lot on what your team feels ready to take on, but if you take on a low minimum threshold for what you consider to be acceptable performance in your design, don't be so shocked when your robot works no better than you designed it to.

You're totally right! A box has a very high performance this game as a minimum. I guess that means it is probably the lowest benchmark you can safely use when designing a good bot because you can already see how many teams are going to try it.
Who said 397 would design a box on wheels? Trust me, I had a mentor on 2337 have to explain the KISS (Keep it simple Schreiber) principle to me earlier today. The answer to that is I will push our students to do more than that.

I am saying that I don't want to see a world where doing the bare minimum is rewarded. If you want to compete w/ less resources FIRST just isn't for you. FIRST is for those teams that partner w/ a corporate sponsor. If a team doesn't have a sponsor why is it FIRST's job to design for them? Remember, FIRST is not about teaching students. FIRST is all about partnering students with industry and making kids realize engineers are a hell of a lot better role models than Paris Hilton. Why should FIRST encourage these teams by saying it is ok to not do what FIRST was designed for?

Now, if a box on wheels could be a competitive robot, I am ok with that, but I have to say it is a pretty poor design when a box on wheels can be a competitive robot.
__________________




.
Reply With Quote
  #58   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2009, 23:49
BenB's Avatar
BenB BenB is offline
Registered User
AKA: Ben Bennett
FRC #1114 (Simbotics)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Oakville, ON
Posts: 102
BenB has a reputation beyond reputeBenB has a reputation beyond reputeBenB has a reputation beyond reputeBenB has a reputation beyond reputeBenB has a reputation beyond reputeBenB has a reputation beyond reputeBenB has a reputation beyond reputeBenB has a reputation beyond reputeBenB has a reputation beyond reputeBenB has a reputation beyond reputeBenB has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Anybody really dis-like the game?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan2081 View Post
The only thing I don't like is that this is going to be like gym class dodgeball. The more athletic kids, like basketball/baseball players are going to have a biiiig advantage over others.
This is my beef as well. I don't think its fair how much humans will be able to score this year, it's supposed to be about the robots.

I especially dislike the super cells. I think the bonus points idea is great, but they are located behind the alliance station wall. There is no way to get the ball on the field, without throwing it. Unless the balls are thrown in the hopper of an alliance robot, super cells will only be scored by humans, which I predict will be the difference in winning in many games.

I like the challenge of the new surface (I hated it at first), but there is way to much human scoring this year.
__________________
2010-present - Team 1114 - Simbotics
2007-2009 -Team 2166 - Bluebotics
Reply With Quote
  #59   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-01-2009, 00:06
JaneYoung JaneYoung is offline
Onward through the fog.
no team
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Austin, TX USA
Posts: 5,996
JaneYoung has a reputation beyond reputeJaneYoung has a reputation beyond reputeJaneYoung has a reputation beyond reputeJaneYoung has a reputation beyond reputeJaneYoung has a reputation beyond reputeJaneYoung has a reputation beyond reputeJaneYoung has a reputation beyond reputeJaneYoung has a reputation beyond reputeJaneYoung has a reputation beyond reputeJaneYoung has a reputation beyond reputeJaneYoung has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Anybody really dis-like the game?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Schreiber View Post
I am saying that I don't want to see a world where doing the bare minimum is rewarded. If you want to compete w/ less resources FIRST just isn't for you. FIRST is for those teams that partner w/ a corporate sponsor. If a team doesn't have a sponsor why is it FIRST's job to design for them? Remember, FIRST is not about teaching students. FIRST is all about partnering students with industry and making kids realize engineers are a hell of a lot better role models than Paris Hilton. Why should FIRST encourage these teams by saying it is ok to not do what FIRST was designed for?
Andrew, I can understand your point of view to a point. I'd love to say that in our area of Texas, we have corporate sponsors coming out of the woodwork. That's not necessarily the case. We have teams in the central Texas area who are working very hard to make that ideology a reality, but it takes a lot of effort and hard work. In the meantime, teams are encouraged to find businesses to work with them, obtaining smaller donations/sponsorships, that help add up and help support the teams. There are areas in the FRC communities, globally, that don't have a lot of technical mentor support. The teams work on that but some struggle with it year after year. There are threads in CD that discuss the struggles. Do teams that struggle for corporate sponsorship, that lose corporate sponsorship, that struggle to obtain and retain technical sponsors, fail to belong in FRC? Who decides that? Inspiration is available to everyone. Teams that compete in regionals/competitions and those who are able to go to the Championship, are exposed to incredible mentors. Many of them are the inspectors that work so hard to help the teams qualify. Many are refs, many are field volunteers, coaches, emcees, announcers, pit admins. The teams that are not flush with resources, still have equal access to the experience... to inspiration. To scholarships. To internship opportunities. That's real, that's not ideology.

As far as boxes on wheels... good things happen with boxes on wheels. Ask anyone who was at some of the regionals around the world in 2008. There was a lot of inspiration occurring, a lot of community development going on, a lot of fun happening in a lot of places. I could write a book about OKC's inaugural regional last year and the transformation of some of the teams from Thursday to Saturday. None of the rookies, who formed the majority of teams at that regional, left the competition or the field empty handed. They walked away having gained experience, confidence, a sense of achievement and wonder. Working with mentors like Andy Baker as your head ref can do that.

I will never be convinced that FRC is for an elitist group of mentors or students with deep pockets in the resources area.
--
As for judging this game so early regarding robot design and strategy - I have a feeling that this game, like the others, is layered with possibilities, and teams who think carefully and consider many options, will come up with lots of surprises and innovative ideas. And, regarding labeling the positions with the appropriate titles given - it is going to make it so easy to help explain the game to fans, guests, and viewers. I think it is great.
__________________
Excellence is contagious. ~ Andy Baker, President, AndyMark, Inc. and Woodie Flowers Award 2003

Character cannot be developed in ease and quiet. Only through experience of trial and suffering can the soul be strengthened, ambition inspired, and success achieved.
~ Helen Keller
(1880-1968)

Last edited by JaneYoung : 05-01-2009 at 14:52.
Reply With Quote
  #60   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-01-2009, 00:28
mrnoble's Avatar
mrnoble mrnoble is offline
teacher/coach
FRC #1339 (Angelbotics)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: denver, co
Posts: 983
mrnoble has a reputation beyond reputemrnoble has a reputation beyond reputemrnoble has a reputation beyond reputemrnoble has a reputation beyond reputemrnoble has a reputation beyond reputemrnoble has a reputation beyond reputemrnoble has a reputation beyond reputemrnoble has a reputation beyond reputemrnoble has a reputation beyond reputemrnoble has a reputation beyond reputemrnoble has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Anybody really dis-like the game?

Andrew, I think you're making a grave error in your assessment of the purpose and structure of FIRST. FRC is broad enough to encompass the well-sponsored and highly organized as well as the rookie team made up of a couple kids and a Literature teacher who got a scholarship from NASA. We should celebrate the achievements of both extremes, and the progress made by those who are moving more towards the model you put forth. For nearly all FIRST teams, it takes (many) years to achieve steady corporate sponsorship and consistent mentoring. As far as I'm concerned, this game, and the way it was presented by Kamen et al, is an acknowledgment and affirmation of this aspect of FRC, and I like it.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
i am really bored and fell like making things videoguy Chit-Chat 0 09-03-2007 19:22
What it's really like....... Tri_Lam Rules/Strategy 2 06-03-2007 23:02
What teams would you really like to meet at a FIRST event? ZPaul General Forum 107 23-07-2006 02:26
No really, what do you think the game will be like? Joe Matt General Forum 27 06-01-2004 10:12
Is it really just a game? ThePaleOne Chit-Chat 0 13-01-2003 01:09


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:17.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi