|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Round Belting - Solid vs. Hollow, Polycord vs. McMaster
Don't waste $500 on the McMaster "welding kit"; the solid core polycord can be welded with just a lighter. Just cut the cord 10% shorter than the actual distance necessary, melt the ends with the lighter, stick them together (use the inside of aluminum angle to keep them lined up), and wait five minutes. Now use a razor and trim off all the globs of melted cord around the joint so it is smooth and wait another half hour to let it cure and achieve full strength.
I've used the McMaster round belting as well as name-brand Polycord from Small Parts. They are pretty much the same, except McMaster ships a lot faster. Just watch out: the endless belts offered by McMaster are nice in the fact that they already come preset to the length you want, however they are a lot more expensive per foot to buy (0.25" continuous belt is about 4x more expensive per foot than plain belting). // Also, for anyone else who may be reading this thread: if you want to purchase polycord material from McMaster, don't search for polycord, as this will only bring up one result. Search for round belting to get the whole list of hollow and solid core belting in the various colors (green, orange, clear). |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Round Belting - Solid vs. Hollow, Polycord vs. McMaster
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Round Belting - Solid vs. Hollow, Polycord vs. McMaster
Polycord is a brand name of Habasit for their urethane round belt product. They are the same material.
|
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Round Belting - Solid vs. Hollow, Polycord vs. McMaster
We used the namebrand polycord in our 2006 bot. Just melt the ends and stick and you have a solid connection. We did not break one belt through the entire season. However, from what I've heard you dont need the name brand stuff. Its cheap enough that you can buy a few different types from mcmaster to see whats best for you.
Last edited by Brandon Holley : 08-01-2009 at 09:20. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Round Belting - Solid vs. Hollow, Polycord vs. McMaster
In 2006 in fact, our robot actually used the belting for our ball gatherer system. This is what I found:
We initially had some of the solid core stuff laying around, so we used it... it was actually pretty difficult to melt though. We used a heat gun to melt the edges and pushed them together and waited for them to dry. The resulting seem was strong, but it was difficult to make, and it required testing to find out how much the joint would shrink/grow from the original cut of the material. We later used the hollow core belts with the barbs. To me this seemed a lot easier. The barbs are simple enough to use, and they allow your loop to be the exact size as the length you cut. We never had a barb pull out in competition, and they were just as strong if not stronger as our weld joints (of course this might have been due to shoddy welding). unless the belting is making particularly tight turns, the barbs should not necessarily be a problem. Hint for using either type: make your loop first, THEN try looping it around where you need it... I made the mistake of trying to stretch it into place and assemble it my first time... Dont make fun of me, I was a freshman!! |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Round Belting - Solid vs. Hollow, Polycord vs. McMaster
I would agree with Arthur, don't waste your time with the hollow core. I think i did all the polycord for 610's 06 bot in like an hour by melting the ends with a one of those small table top heaters (melting the material on a piece of AL placed on top of the heater as to not ruin the heater) and then stuck them together and trimmed the excess with a exacto-knife. Polycord make belting systems really easy to put together, not tight enough just cut a bit off and reattach.
|
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Round Belting - Solid vs. Hollow, Polycord vs. McMaster
Thanks to everyone for the helpful replies. For 1/4" belting the solid core at McMaster is $.90/ft and the hollow is $1.22/ft. It sounds like we can't go wrong by getting either of them, and it is pretty apparent that the custom welding set up won't be needed.
As for the brand-name polycord at smallparts... well... it doesn't sound like the 400% increase in price ($4.20 in 10' lengths) is worth it. And the tips on the wide belting from econobelt are good too. Thanks to all, Jason |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Round Belting - Solid vs. Hollow, Polycord vs. McMaster
Quote:
http://www.drillspot.com/products/42...YV9_Round_Belt What do most people suggest in terms of texture of the belt ? Orange = Smooth (hardness = Shore A 90) Green = Rough Clear = Smooth (hardness = Shore A 80) What's the difference between clear & orange, mainly hardness ? How does hardness affect ball collecting ability? Last edited by lynca : 09-01-2009 at 16:58. |
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Round Belting - Solid vs. Hollow, Polycord vs. McMaster
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Round Belting - Solid vs. Hollow, Polycord vs. McMaster
Quote:
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Round Belting - Solid vs. Hollow, Polycord vs. McMaster
We have some of that green polycord stuff lying around...
We've never used it, it doesn't look like it could apply sufficient grip to lift the balls. Has anyone tested it out on the balls? We've always used neoprene o-rings from mcmaster. They'll only last the season before falling apart, but they have tremendous grip and are very strong. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Round Belting - Solid vs. Hollow, Polycord vs. McMaster
So I've been searching for these on McMaster, and I've narrowed it down to 3 colors. One of these colors (green) has a larger minimum pulley diameter than the other two. Aside from obviously needing to use a larger pulley, what does this mean about the belt itself? Someone mentioned that the green was more rough than the other colors, it also happens to be the one that needs a larger pulley. Is this because it is more rough?
I also just noticed that the green stuff is $5.40 per foot as opposed to the other ones that are $.99 per foot. |
|
#13
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Round Belting - Solid vs. Hollow, Polycord vs. McMaster
Quote:
the material that is $5.40 / foot is reinforced. |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Round Belting - Solid vs. Hollow, Polycord vs. McMaster
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Round Belting - Solid vs. Hollow, Polycord vs. McMaster
I have a question about what rollers people are using with the polycord. Specifically for the drive roller and then the idlers. I had thought pvc pipe, but I presume there are other more elegant solutions available. Thanks.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Hollow Shaft optical encoders | magical hands | Control System | 2 | 24-03-2005 09:12 |
| Hollow Shaft optical encoders | magical hands | Robotics Education and Curriculum | 0 | 03-02-2005 22:56 |
| Polycord Belting | Claires4sorrow | Technical Discussion | 1 | 31-01-2004 13:37 |
| solid edge solid works | ceileachair | Inventor | 1 | 21-01-2003 22:03 |
| HELP! ChiefDelphi needs Green 1/4" polycord! | Brandon Martus | General Forum | 1 | 14-03-2002 19:25 |