|
|
|
 Transparency is the sign of BAD LARD! - ExcuseBoy [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| Transparency is the sign of BAD LARD! - ExcuseBoy [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#2
05-01-2009, 00:36
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: My case against <G14>
Sure it seems like a semi-feasable idea to level out the field, but there should be no rule, ever, that prevents teams from showing their true strength, then recieve a penalty for it. I firmly believe that this rule will cause MAJOR sandbagging, and will cause teams to not "shoot for the moon" with their robot designs. I would be really happy for this rule to be either obliterated or drastically changed, maybe only involving personal scores and the only penalties distributed are individual.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| <G14> Shenanigans? | Team1710 | Rules/Strategy | 123 | 12-01-2009 12:42 |
| Rule G14 | KE5WGE | Technical Discussion | 3 | 03-01-2009 17:36 |
| G14 & a difference between start & end of match | Elgin Clock | Rules/Strategy | 6 | 09-01-2008 20:26 |
| G14 - ball on rack at end | ericand | Rules/Strategy | 5 | 09-01-2008 08:00 |
| Unsportsmanlike conduct. 3 against 1 | angryyoungnpoor | General Forum | 16 | 14-03-2004 08:42 |
Threaded Mode