Go to Post I wouldn't trade my FIRST experiences for the world. - Koko Ed [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
View Poll Results: Rear wheel drive vs. Front wheel drive vs. All wheel drive
All wheel drive 110 88.71%
Rear wheel drive 7 5.65%
Front wheel drive 7 5.65%
Voters: 124. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-01-2009, 08:27
Bongle's Avatar
Bongle Bongle is offline
Registered User
FRC #2702 (REBotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Waterloo
Posts: 1,069
Bongle has a reputation beyond reputeBongle has a reputation beyond reputeBongle has a reputation beyond reputeBongle has a reputation beyond reputeBongle has a reputation beyond reputeBongle has a reputation beyond reputeBongle has a reputation beyond reputeBongle has a reputation beyond reputeBongle has a reputation beyond reputeBongle has a reputation beyond reputeBongle has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via MSN to Bongle
Re: 4 wheel drive vs. 2 wheel drive

Quote:
Originally Posted by Betty_Krocker View Post
Edit: All wheel drive might help but might be wasting power, motors, and battery life...
(i have done some tests and this is what i get, but its up to you)
All wheel drive absolutely helps.

The physics reason for all wheel drive is this:
1) Let's say your robot has 4 wheels
2) Each of these wheels supports some fraction fi of your robot's weight. The sum of all Fi = 1.
3) Each wheel will thus have a normal force of mRobot*fi*g = 9.81*mRobot*fi
4) Each wheel will thus be able to generate (if powered) a frictional force of
Ff = u*Fn
Ff = 0.06 * (9.81*mRobot*fi)
Ff = 0.5886*mRobot*fi
5) Your robot's total potential frictional force is the sum of the frictional forces of all of its driven wheels.
6) For an all wheel drive robot, FfRobot = 0.5886*mRobot (because Fi sums to 1)
7) For a 2WD robot with its weight evenly distributed, we know all the Fis are 0.25 (due to equal weight), but only two of them are driven. So FfRobot = 0.2943*mRobot, or half of the AWD's robot full force.

So based on 5), 6), and 7), we know that by choosing not to drive some of your wheels, you are throwing away potential friction. Wheels that are touching the floor while the robot is driving and are not powered are completely wasting potential friction. A robot with its weight evenly distributed over 4 wheels that only drives two wheels will be two times slower than an identical all wheel drive robot. The two wheel robot could potentially employ a very complicated suspension so that its weight shifts onto its driven wheels when acceleration or decelerating, but it would be a waste of time when you could just drive all four wheels.

Last edited by Bongle : 06-01-2009 at 08:30.
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
6 wheel drive Shaggy1323 Technical Discussion 3 28-03-2008 17:50
Lowered Center Wheel for 6 wheel drive 987HighRoller Technical Discussion 37 17-01-2007 01:21
pic: Jester Drive:Mecanum Wheel Drive Train Ken Delaney 357 Technical Discussion 64 29-03-2006 22:16
pic: Chantilly Academy's 4 Wheel Drive 4 Wheel Steering!!!! jskene Robot Showcase 25 18-02-2005 20:24
2-wheel versus 4-wheel drive Ben Mitchell Technical Discussion 23 07-11-2003 00:50


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 22:24.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi