|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Implementing Traction Control for an advantage in the 2009 game
What I am thinking of is a simple, program-level, "pseudo-pulse"; can't think of the word off the top of my head, but it would pretend that the input is pulsing at a rapid rate, and then have a button mapped to turn this pulse on or off, just in case it needs to be off. Granted, the on-off button would only work in teleop, but it's still better than nothing and can easily be implemented by a loop with a wait of, say, 10 ms. Would this work, or would this just be interpreted as just a steady stream? I didn't look too deep into the specifics of the control system, but this is my interpretation of a traction control mechanism implemented in the software level. And yes, I am a rookie.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The 2009 Control System Q&A Thread | crake | FRC Control System | 59 | 11-01-2009 10:43 |
| Drive train for 2009 game | hihihiflcl81pig | General Forum | 4 | 27-12-2008 02:17 |
| Buying the 2009 control system | BornaE | FRC Control System | 9 | 16-10-2008 17:16 |
| The Access Points on the 2009 Control System | Shadow503 | Rumor Mill | 10 | 28-04-2008 23:22 |
| UNFAIR ADVANTAGE for CDI and new control system | archiver | 2000 | 6 | 23-06-2002 22:13 |