|
|
|
 Either way, FIRST works. You just have to keep the big picture in mind. - Lux [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| Either way, FIRST works. You just have to keep the big picture in mind. - Lux [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#3
07-01-2009, 12:11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: WIPILib vs. LabView?
I sort-of tried to address this question briefly in another thread:
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...8&postcount=14 Basically, they are both equally capable programming languages. Some people prefer C++ because procedural programming is more familiar to them. Don't dismiss LabVIEW as a toy-language just because it's "programmed visually". Personally, I'm going with LabVIEW since it tends to be more syntactically forgiving and more intuitive (and hopefully easier to teach). Last edited by GregT : 07-01-2009 at 12:14. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Labview Servos | quizbiz | NI LabVIEW | 5 | 09-01-2009 08:48 |
| LabVIEW vs C/C++ | 3DWolf | Programming | 11 | 05-12-2008 09:14 |
| learning LabVIEW | Lions for First | National Instruments LabVIEW and Data Acquisition | 11 | 21-04-2008 15:26 |
| Labview | tseres | Programming | 2 | 23-05-2007 00:27 |
| Labview | Phreakuency | LabView and Data Acquisition | 6 | 14-01-2006 01:14 |
Threaded Mode