|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Team Update #2
I still don't know one question:
If a robot pours a few orbit balls onto an already filled-to-the-top goal, do those balls get scored even if they just fall out? Do the balls that stay on the top for a few seconds then fall out because the trailer moved get scored? |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Team Update #2
Quote:
Scores are determined based on the state of the GAME PIECES at the end of the MATCH. so the fallen balls wont count |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Team Update #2
Quote:
Edit: Nevermind...both are correct. Scores are calculated at the end unless the trailer tips over. Last edited by cabbagekid2 : 09-01-2009 at 17:30. Reason: clarification |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Team Update #2
Quote:
thanks |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Team Update #2
Is it new for team updates to contain advice toward specific designs?
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Team Update #2
Can someone explain what they are talking about in the bumper section? I understand the individual rules they stated, but then the next paragraph and the pictures I dont understand. What are they trying to say?
Joey |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Team Update #2
i think they are talking about a "wide drive bot" which means the 38" section is the front and the 28" the sides
with a wide drive you could follow the all of the r<08> bumper rules and be able to "engulf" the enemy trailer and constrain its movement there are many uses for that |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Team Update #2
Quote:
Joey Last edited by Laaba 80 : 09-01-2009 at 18:17. |
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Team Update #2
I'm suprised, still no mention of G14 changes.
|
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Team Update #2
I would've like if they commented on their being bumpers on the front because of the only 37" inches of unbumpered left, or if there are simply required regardless.
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Team Update #2
The thing that is confusing me is the 6" section part of the rule.
If they require that a wide-drive 'bot have 6" of bumpers in the front, then how did figure 8-2 come to pass? That figure clearly shows a bumper piece that wraps around a corner. Is that legal because it's more than 90-degrees? How do you measure the length of an L-shaped bumper? Couldn't you just add up the internal lengths? Theoretically you might be able to make an L-shaped bumper that has 4" on one side and 2" on the other. Figure 8-2 and the 6" rule are making my head hurt. |
|
#12
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Team Update #2
Quote:
I had this exact same thought and I asked it on the Q&A. It seems to me that these 2 are contradictory. I also wonder the same as Jgannon why they are addressing specific robot designs in the rules. It is really starting to make me wonder why they just didn't include an instruction manual with the kit this year saying "we want you to build this" |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Team Update #2
Quote:
Idk man....I'm not liking this very much still =/ But, I'm still open to changes. |
|
#14
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Team Update #2
The 6" bumper picture doesn't make sense. It clearly states in the rules that a bumper can use a pool noodle vertically oriented at the end or bevel the edges. If you bevel the edges you get 3" of bumper sticking out from the bumper perimiter and this is specifically legal. That leaves 3 more inches required to get 6. What they show is 9" of bumper, not 6" (my 4 year old showed me the math behind that one). Since when did 3 + 6 = 6?
Last edited by Paul Copioli : 09-01-2009 at 19:11. |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Team Update #2
Alright, that makes more sense.
Last edited by Laaba 80 : 09-01-2009 at 19:13. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Team Update 17 | ntroup | General Forum | 33 | 14-03-2007 16:58 |
| Team Update # 11 | Bcahn836 | Rumor Mill | 6 | 21-02-2004 07:33 |
| Team Update #3 | dez250 | General Forum | 4 | 21-01-2004 11:56 |
| Team Update 5 | archiver | 2001 | 4 | 23-06-2002 23:36 |