|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Robot orientation
This orientation question seems fairly simple. Make your robot wide if you plan on doing any kind of serious ball gathering. Unless there are other mechanisms that reqire a long orientation, I think wide is the way to go for a maximum frontal opening and ball gathering space. Remember the diameter of the balls is 9". Based on the 6" bumper rule, the maximum opening would be 16" for a long robot and 26" for a wide robot.
However, bumpers have to extend into the corners and can be up to 3 1/2" thick. This sets up the possibility that part of the 6" for the front bumpers will overlap the side bumper and each front bumper will actually cover only 2 1/2" of the front side leaving a possible 33" opening for a wide orientation and 23" opening for long orientation. Based on Team Update #2 and the drawing with the trailer and the robot, I think this is not FIRST's intention and that the six inches must be part of the actual robot surface. I plan to ask on Q&A. Ooops, it looks like some one got to it before me. The bumper must be touching the robot to be considered part of the 6". Last edited by rjohnson : 10-01-2009 at 21:15. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Robot orientation
Having been out of it for awhile, I just don't understand this bumper rule fetish. What is wrong with dents and gashes and the occasional 'bot that can't take a hit? Is Pool Noodle, Inc. a major sponsor?
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Robot orientation: Long or wide? | razor95kds | Technical Discussion | 20 | 13-01-2007 14:10 |
| battery orientation | Brawler006 | Electrical | 8 | 26-01-2004 08:57 |
| Orientation Switch | CyberWolf_22 | Programming | 6 | 04-02-2003 10:42 |
| Compressor Orientation | Suneet | Technical Discussion | 5 | 25-01-2002 17:33 |