|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Legal Bumper Configuration?
The text under the highlighted points of R08 in team update #2 has a few choice words that lead me to believe their intent is to prevent a high level of goal incursion I suppose for robot safety and limiting offensive tactics.
|
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Legal Bumper Configuration?
I think it was meant to point out that many legal bumper configurations allow the goal to protrude, and teams should be aware of possible goal to inner robot interaction.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Legal Bumper Configuration?
The GDC has spoken
http://forums.usfirst.org/showthread.php?t=11159 Quote:
|
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Legal Bumper Configuration?
Well, we know it's not legal now.
We've made our changes, and in the long run this wasn't a biggie now that we know. I wasn't mad at the GDC or trying to exploit anything, I just wanted to make sure we'd show up to the event and not be at a disadvantage. For not being able to do FIRST 24/7 of their lives, I think the GDC is doing a good job. I like how there is 10x more complaining being heard than praise to the GDC for substantially simplified rules. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| What is a legal bumper? | lemon1324 | Technical Discussion | 10 | 26-01-2008 18:23 |
| pic: Bumper and me | lilac | Extra Discussion | 7 | 09-01-2008 16:22 |
| pic: Team 1178 Robot - Starting Configuration | Jake M | Extra Discussion | 1 | 01-03-2007 22:34 |
| pic: A possible configuration of A-Rack-Nid | DanDon | Extra Discussion | 2 | 08-02-2007 15:10 |
| pic: 114 Bumper Art | CraigHickman | Extra Discussion | 6 | 20-03-2006 20:35 |