Starting position rule "change"?

[GaryVoshol]

Yes, I may be nit-picking. I presume the dimensions of the LAUNCH PAD prevent too much slop here. But I could envision a team that places their robot to the far right of the PAD with the trailer to the far left, with the hitch at maximum angle, resulting in the side of the trailer touching the wall (not just the vertex). I'm wondering if this ruling means that the trailer must be positioned 90 degrees with respect to the wall. I guess I wonder what "flush" means.

[Nuttyman54]

Originally Posted by GaryVoshol

Yes, I may be nit-picking. I presume the dimensions of the LAUNCH PAD prevent too much slop here. But I could envision a team that places their robot to the far right of the PAD with the trailer to the far left, with the hitch at maximum angle, resulting in the side of the trailer touching the wall (not just the vertex). I'm wondering if this ruling means that the trailer must be positioned 90 degrees with respect to the wall. I guess I wonder what "flush" means.

Because the trailer tongue is attached at a corner of the trailer, not on a face, the end opposite the tongue is a corner as well. I would think this should give a fair bit of wiggle room to be "flush" and still have something of an angle on it.

[Rick Wagner]

One of our autonomous modes is optimized if the trailer touches the wall not at the rear vertex. I suppose we should take the Q&A constraint as ruling that starting position out.