|
|
|
 The GDC has spoken, we have listened and will follow their ruling. - ChuckDickerson [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating: 
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
| The GDC has spoken, we have listened and will follow their ruling. - ChuckDickerson [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#19
28-01-2009, 08:39
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Robot Bumpers
*headondesk* sorry
Anyways, as far as i know D and A would we most defiantly unprotected, since there is a hole in between them, if you angle the end of your tubes, and the end of bumpers at a 45 degree angle then it would most likely be legal. ends C & F you should be able to extend your bumpers around that corner to make one massive bumper, because the ungodly 6 inch rule applies to the whole bumper, not bumper past the vertex of a corner by my understanding 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| pic: PD-1345's 2008 robot without bumpers | Arefin Bari | Robot Showcase | 2 | 23-02-2008 23:44 |
| pic: Finished 1024 2008 Robot (without black bumpers to show detail) | Qbranch | Extra Discussion | 5 | 19-02-2008 20:51 |
| pic: Purple Bumpers - 418 | leeweek | Extra Discussion | 5 | 05-04-2007 00:12 |
| pic: RC 1736 bumpers | bam_415 | Extra Discussion | 5 | 27-02-2007 20:12 |
| Robot bumpers | EricLeifermann | Technical Discussion | 15 | 12-01-2007 02:18 |
Threaded Mode