|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
My heart is with Raul, but Bill's case is strong
Posted by Joe Johnson at 02/25/2001 9:46 PM EST
Engineer on team #47, Chief Delphi, from Pontiac Central High School and Delphi Automotive Systems. In Reply to: I read it that changes are OK Posted by Gary Bonner on 02/25/2001 8:56 PM EST: Since I was planning on having about 2 weeks of drive time for our robot, I didn't plan to need to add anything to the robot this year, so I was not paying particularly close attention. But, as things have turned out, we had almost no practice time, so this rule has become much more interesting. My original reading of the rules had me solidly in Raul's camp, but Bill has made a very strong case that I was wrong. I don't know how this is going to work in principle but it seems on its face that what you shipped is what you play with. Only improvements and repairs, no wholesale additions. While on some level I can get behind this rule, on another it seems that it could be very hard on some teams. In addition to Raul's cases, there are a lot more. If engineering is to cease (as Bill argues), what about programming? Can new program features be added? Strict judges may say no. Even changes that seem on their face to be improvements can add functionality that was lacking before. For example, a robot arm may not be intended to reset the bridge, but with a different ratio, may do it just fine. Would the ratio change be allowed if the purpose was to perform a new task? Again, a strict judge may say no. I know that Bill and Brian Beatty have long been advocates of the no-changes rule. I am on the fence. While my team has made changes in the past (when they were clearly allowed), on balance, my team is helped by a no change rule (though perhaps not this year... time will tell). But, I think that this rule could also lock a lot of teams into a design that may make the entire FIRST experience a miserable one. I suppose I should end with a call for someone to get a clear ruling from FIRST on this one. Any takers? Joe J. P.S. I am taking a well deserved vacation day with my family on Monday, or I would call myself. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Proposed New Rule M11 | Joe Johnson | Rules/Strategy | 14 | 04-02-2003 14:41 |
| Stretchers | archiver | 2001 | 14 | 24-06-2002 02:15 |
| Drill motor change out question?? | archiver | 2001 | 9 | 23-06-2002 23:36 |
| Possible Rule change for Flordia? (Please) and the reason for more seeding rounds. | archiver | 1999 | 6 | 23-06-2002 22:09 |
| 1 coach rule | Mike Soukup | Rules/Strategy | 14 | 07-01-2002 22:27 |