|
|
|
 My contention is that there is not a whit of difference between noting that a change like that has to be made, and making the change. - Kris Verdeyen [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| My contention is that there is not a whit of difference between noting that a change like that has to be made, and making the change. - Kris Verdeyen [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#2
08-02-2009, 12:50
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: TwoColorTrackDemo Vertical Sweep
If you mounted your camera upside down or made your gimbal the opposite of the way the code expected, you wouldn't see random movements, but opposite movements. This would quickly cause the camera to lose the target.
I think it is pretty easy to swap the movements in the C code. Greg McKaskle 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| problem with TwoColorTrackDemo-v2 | mahmosh | C/C++ | 5 | 20-01-2009 09:30 |
| Team 867 is going to sweep the competition | seanl | Robot Showcase | 10 | 10-03-2008 17:11 |
| Size of the Pan-Tilt's Sweep? | geeknerd99 | Programming | 1 | 27-01-2006 20:25 |
| Vertical bar interaction | Madison | Rules/Strategy | 5 | 10-01-2004 16:22 |
| vertical conveyor belt | ahecht | Technical Discussion | 3 | 15-02-2002 16:16 |
Threaded Mode