Go to Post "The world is not idiot-proof. Pay Attention." - DonRotolo [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Control System > FRC Control System
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-02-2009, 03:02
dtengineering's Avatar
dtengineering dtengineering is online now
Teaching Teachers to Teach Tech
AKA: Jason Brett
no team (British Columbia FRC teams)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,827
dtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Shipping the CRio

Quote:
Originally Posted by jgraber View Post
See also the Feb 9 Q&A section 8 regarding intersection of Rule 35 and Rule 35. The CRio is a COTS or at least KOP exact replacement item (to itself), so in unassembled form, it is an unlimited COTS spare per rule 35, as far as I can tell from the quad-sylables in the Answer.
Whoa... that Q&A needs to be read by teams thinking about maximizing their options under the withholiding allowance. This is the link http://forums.usfirst.org/showthread.php?t=11854

It had not occurred to me that an assembled Toughbox might not count towards the 40 pounds of fabricated items (because it is COTS). Nor had it occurred to me that the cRio, if completely detached from the control board, was also COTS and wouldn't count towards the limit. Presumably CIM motors, also COTS, don't count towards the withholding weight limit, either.

As I reflect upon this, it seems to make sense, as a sufficiently wealthy team could just purchase spares of each of these, use them for testing and practice with their fabricated parts and then detach them and leave them at home... a bit of a waste, so why not exclude them from the withholding allowance and reduce the "money factor" a bit for everyone.

Now presumably this means that CIMs are also COTS, so if you keep back your (assembled, although not bolted to the robot) toughboxes, and a couple of CIMs, then that doesn't count towards your 40 pound limit, so long as you have not modified them to become fabricated items.

This is important, particularly for teams doing one regional, later in the season who wish to maximize the benefit of the new withholding allowance. This is a big paradigm shift (one that I think I'm in favour of...) and it will probably take teams a season or two to get their heads wrapped around it. Theoretically, if you were good enough at building light enough, you might not have to ship ANYTHING in the crate on ship day. You'd have a busy morning on Thursday bolting everything together... but you would have had a bit of time to practice that in the preceeding weeks.

That is an extreme case, but for our team it means that we'll spend the time between ship day and Seattle driving, developing auto code and working on traction control (The main frame and intake/shooter will ship on Tuesday, but the drive modules and control module have been built specifically with the withholding allowance in mind... but turned out to weigh more than hoped. Discounting the weight of the CIM, cRio and toughbox gears (all easily removable and reattachable) we're back under 40 pounds! Finally the programmers will get their fair amount of time to work on the robot and not just the random moments between wrenchings and weldings in the last week of build!

Jason

Last edited by dtengineering : 10-02-2009 at 03:06.
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Axis camera without the cRIO CrazyCarl461 NI LabVIEW 12 17-01-2009 10:53
purchasing buying the 2009 NI cRIO control system martin417 FRC Control System 10 29-12-2008 12:31
Tricks getting the CRIO to talk to laptop mac7attack FRC Control System 10 08-12-2008 09:20
24v Power Conector to from the PDB to the cRIO mcf747 Electrical 14 01-12-2008 19:19
Students build SEGWAY in 3 months using Labview and the cRIO neutrino15 Programming 31 27-04-2008 22:08


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:01.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi