|
|
|
 Honestly I'm looking forward to just seeing all my friends again, that's what FIRST is really about to me. - Barry Bonzack [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| Honestly I'm looking forward to just seeing all my friends again, that's what FIRST is really about to me. - Barry Bonzack [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#2
10-02-2009, 09:10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Camera tracking at 110ms
I've done the LV timings hundreds of times. 640x480 is around 5fps, 320x240 is around 10fps, and 160x120 is around 25fps. If you decimate some, you can improve it further.
You can definitely get 110ms or better. What are your other constraints? Greg McKaskle |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Camera Tracking | Tanner | NI LabVIEW | 5 | 01-02-2009 11:28 |
| Camera locked in "tracking", but not tracking | geeknerd99 | Programming | 1 | 18-02-2007 22:47 |
| camera tracking | geekofband007 | Programming | 15 | 15-02-2007 23:50 |
| Camera tracking problem | Windward | Programming | 2 | 15-01-2007 17:59 |
| Camera Tracking Problem | cprogrammer | Programming | 1 | 18-02-2005 15:00 |
Threaded Mode