|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: WiFi in pits
Only 1024 Bytes are getting transmitted back and forth by the cRIO and Driver Station, I don't think degration will be any problem with Wireless N.
Last year we got WiFi in the area provided by the arena or some other higher-up being, I hope we will again this year, we used it to help keep our sponsors up-to-date! ~DtD |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: WiFi in pits
In any case, regular Wi-fi works on the 2.4 GHz radio band, while the robot's radios work on the 5 GHz band. Therefore, there should be no problems. (Cell phones work on the 850 / 1900 MHz band so there shouldn't be problems with that either.)
Of course, this is from a practical point of view; I'm not sure about the rules here. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: WiFi in pits
My take on the intent of the rule prohibiting "wireless" communication is to prevent the Commander from talking to the Outpost Payload Specialist via walkie talkie headset or to prevent communication between the Commander and a scout in the audience. I don't think it's for technical reasons (interference prevention). That's an FCC concern. My take, not official. It would be nice if there were clarification on Q&A.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: WiFi in pits
Quote:
Would it be against the rules to _use_ the 10k Lakes Wi-Fi network for communication? |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: WiFi in pits
Our team is doing something along these lines for scouting, and we been granted permission from the regional we are attending to set up a special wireless network for our project. You should try contacting your regional to see if they can accomodate you.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: WiFi in pits
A regional couldn't override the official FIRST rules. There are a gazzilion reasons to allow all the teams to have a wireless network for whatever reasons (scouting, source code management, like from SVN or DARCS, making certain that your girlfriend isn't talking to a nerd from another team - YOU are the only nerd she should talk to, etc.).
There may be concerns that having 100 wireless networks may interfere with the competition. Since the robots were conrolled by RF last year, that may have been the source of the no radio rule. Certainly they knew that cell phones couldn't interfere (I don't know what frequency they were using, but it would have been a violation of law by FIRST to use anything in the cell phone bands). Not allowing control of the robots by wireless at the competition other than on the field makes lots of sense. It would be easy to interfere with each other and thus lose control of the robots. Spot WiFi was availble at the Peachtree last year, provided by the venue. Having one or a hundred WiFi networks won't interfere with the competition, assuming that the WiFis don't transmit on the competition frequency and they are managed properly. I can see FIRST prohibiting privat WiFis just for this reason - how can they tell that some team hasn't misconfigured their network? (Well, they could, but that would take extra effort.) This is all useless speculation. Someone needs to post a well formulated question on the usfirst forum. And we will all need alternatives to having a private WiFi network just in case. Last edited by SoftwareMentor : 26-02-2009 at 19:33. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: WiFi in pits
Team Update 13:
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: WiFi in pits
At the DC Regional, the convention center provides the WiFi, which is about $25 a day...
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: WiFi in pits
When we compete at the Minnesota venue (William's Arena) there was the University network (and that's what I used). There should be zero problems and I won't judge with the rules but I guess the easiest thing to do is to ask a regional manager there.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: WiFi in pits
Quote:
1.Someone didn't get the memo--after all, some of these events have thousands of spectators, and not all of them are neccesarily going to know the rules 2.Someone is deliberatley trying to bring down the system by use of a jammer or some wifi-specific attack |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: WiFi in pits
In any case, there's not much that can be done about it, nor do they really do anything. At Buckeye, I turned on Airport (yes, I was using a mac) every so often to see if there were any networks that weren't supposed to exist. In what is probably an a/b/g (maybe not even a) card, I saw 2 networks which existed the whole day and at least 5 others that popped in and out throughout the day, a few of which were named '___ (team number removed) laptop connect.' Nothing was done about it.
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: WiFi in pits
Quote:
• Robots may be operated via wireless control only on the competition or practice fields. • Two-way radios or other form of wireless communications are not allowed (with the exception of the previous bullet). Wireless communications, and that includes wifi routers for scoring, laptop to laptop networks, etc. with the exception of cellphones is NOT ALLOWED. |
|
#13
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: WiFi in pits
There were a few dozen people spotted with their lap-tops open and in use in that stands at MWR. I'm not saying they were using wifi but they were on their computers. So how is [i]FIRST[i] going to enforce a no wifi rule?
You can't go around picking up everyones lap-top especially if the person is not a FIRST member. And what about the Blackberries and PDA's? Have their been any problems yet with a person using wifi interfering with the game field or robots? -p ![]() |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: WiFi in pits
At the Buckeye regional we spoke with team 829 about thier scouting program, which was pretty neat by the way. If I remember correctly they said they teamed up with Purdue FIRST and had someting like 12 people watching matches. These people were somehow tied together and then a final program was compiled for use. It seemed to work for them, maybe someone more familiar with it can explain here?
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: WiFi in pits
Quote:
As for the wireless rules, I think FIRST is fully aware of the technical issues with using 5Ghz spectrum and the potential for interference from non Wifi devices. I don't think you will see FIRST come down hard and enforce the rule unless someone is caught intentionally interfering with the field system. That does not mean you shouldn't respect the rules set forth by FIRST even if you are technically sure it wouldn't interfere at all. In the past the FTA would stop by your pit if you were caught using the radio but I didn't hear about that happening at all this week. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| wifi? | compuwiz12 | Scouting | 5 | 19-01-2009 15:45 |
| St Louis Wifi | addictedMax | Chit-Chat | 1 | 28-02-2007 22:31 |
| wifi at nats | Alexander McGee | Championship Event | 7 | 14-04-2004 23:38 |
| WiFi Video Broadcast in Pits at Nats 2004 | HFSbF5 | Championship Event | 5 | 14-04-2004 09:54 |
| Pits were great, venue was the pits... | archiver | 1999 | 17 | 23-06-2002 22:44 |