|
|
|
 The FIRST family is incredible. - Libby Ritchie [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: Do you think it is fair to hold slots for the rookie teams | |||
| Yes |
  
|
50 | 76.92% |
| No |
  
|
12 | 18.46% |
| Maybe |
  
|
3 | 4.62% |
| Voters: 65. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
I agree... Expand the regionals
In no way am I advocating limiting the regional attendance as a substitue to expanding the number and size of the regionals. Expansion of regionals (# and Size) is a preferred path. However, even with expanded regionals and little or no waiting lists, FIRST still needs to 'save' (or ensure there are in some fashion) spots for rookie teams, even at the expense of veteran teams being able to attend mulitple regionals.
 |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| "Fixing" matches | Shawn60 | General Forum | 158 | 18-03-2003 18:41 |
| Hits, Misses, & Suggestions -- long message | archiver | 2000 | 17 | 23-06-2002 23:36 |
| The Case For 'Regionalizing' teams at the Nationals. | archiver | 2000 | 33 | 23-06-2002 23:35 |
| How do we view more teams? | archiver | 2000 | 0 | 23-06-2002 23:11 |
| How do teams hold their brainstorming meetings? | Anton Abaya | General Forum | 10 | 03-01-2002 18:02 |
Hybrid Mode
