|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Get Rid of Time Mutilplier???
Posted by Thomas Grupp at 03/12/2001 3:32 PM EST
Engineer on team #378, Circuit Stompers, from Newfane High School and Delphi Automotive Systems. In Reply to: Getting rid of Time Multiplier? Ridiculus! Posted by Andy Baker on 03/12/2001 12:06 PM EST: I have to agree with Andy. Although my team #378 has yet to compete in a regional, we are attending the Great lakes regional, I can see by watching on nasa tv and reading all the postings. That the TIME multiplier is critical to having a big score IE: 620 @ Wetsern Michigan. I agree that watching this competition is like watching golf, Its not very exciting to watch, But it is Very exciting to Play, Im sure I will find this out at The Great lakes Reg. I also can understand that being behind the Glass is very Chaotic. But that's what I like, and I LOOK FORWARD TO THE GREAT LAKES REGIONAL. |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Poor Man's Balance
Posted by Carolyn Duncan at 03/14/2001 3:46 PM EST
Student on team #495, The Pack, from Jamestown High School and VBEP/Raytheon/Saic. In Reply to: Poor Man's Balance Posted by Justin on 03/11/2001 12:07 PM EST: I agree!!!!! My team,495, was at VCU and felt shafted by this. We designed a manipulator especially for perfect balancing. For us this rule left us a bit unneeded. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Would this balance? | MattK | General Forum | 9 | 16-04-2003 20:11 |
| Curie Division Robots information... (not complete) | archiver | 2001 | 3 | 24-06-2002 03:13 |
| anyone use an arm to help balance | archiver | 2001 | 8 | 24-06-2002 02:46 |
| What do you think of team 131 CHAOS? Pros/Cons | archiver | 2001 | 21 | 24-06-2002 01:45 |
| Mentor/Engineers - Robotics vs. Work Balance | Scott Wolfe | General Forum | 13 | 16-04-2002 12:05 |