Paying to have your event webcast

[Scott L.]

what system would you use to collect money doing a webcast? Would asking for donations be ok? Like if $X was need to do the webcast, and less than $X was sonated, what would be the coarse of action?

[RyanCahoon]

Maybe do it for free but record the video, then clean it up afterward and sell DVDs. Many teams bring their own video recorders and capture the event either off of the FIRST video stream or from handheld camera, but I bet many teams, especially rookies (like us our rookie year) don't and wish afterward that hey had. That's where you come in. $5-$8 a DVD might actually end up being fairly profitable, once you factor in all the grandparents

--Ryan

[Stuart]

depends on the quality. if it included drive team interviews, highlights, team spotlights, and play by plays I might consider donating. If it cuts off the last 2 matches of the finals and who won EI or Chairmans ( like the past 3 NASA broadcasts of the championship) than nothing.

[JesseK]

I'm pretty sure we would pay for a DVD of the full event as an archive, so that counts as paying for the webcast -- nothing huge, probably $10 per DVD.

Video is HUGE when finding the right thing to send to a sponsor. Getting that clip of you doing something crazy, lucky, or downright outrageously funny is exactly what should go at the end of a sponsor video.

[Scott L.]

DVD and match archives would be made. If I was doing the webcast I would do my best to not cut out any of the matches, or awards. We currently don't have the man power to do drive team interviews, but will consider this. As for the play by play, we have left this up to the announcer/MC at the event, if they are dong a play-by-play than it will be webcast/recorded.

[Cory]

Originally Posted by Stuart

If it cuts off the last 2 matches of the finals and who won EI or Chairmans ( like the past 3 NASA broadcasts of the championship) than nothing.

This has nothing to do with NASA. FIRST continually refuses to revise their schedule of the event. They always say it will end by a certain time, and like clockwork every single year it always goes an extra hour or two.

If FIRST extended the schedule then NASA could block off more time on NASA TV...

[Stuart]

I guess the bottom line is that if you offer an extra value for your product . I would pay for it, if not then no. Personally Team interviews/Bios would really be a big buying point for me. Ive always wanted to know why people did what they did and why. But if you dont have the man power for that, ask your self what can I do that isnt being added. Again add value.

as far as the NASA TV thing I never assigned blame just that the problem exists( and the fact that this has gone on for so many years is really a failure on both ends FIRST not stating the times and NASA for not getting that that time is not correct)

[Pat McCarthy]

Last year we had the West Michigan Regional webcast using a professional video distribution service. From what I heard, it wasn't cheap, I think in the neighborhood of a few thousand bucks. That way we were assured a high quality stream.
If it had been my wallet, I'd hook a computer up to the video drop and ustream it or something free. Though, you won't get the quality and reliability for free.

[Scott L.]

I did a rough calculation for a 1000 mile round trip for a 3 day event and came up with roughly $1000.

A sigle day event would cost less

[AV_guy007]

As someone who has pushed webcasts up to NASA's servers its not the setup at the event that is very costly complicated. You need to consider what is serving the content. Do you have a powerful enough server with a fast enough connection? If not make sure to consider the costs of that.

Personally I would not pay for webcasting. I think a better idea would be to talk to people in the community who will be at events and get a network of people that can push a stream to your server, and share the content that way. there is no reason to pay for a crew to travel when there are already people there. Also don't forget you need a good internet connection at the venue which usually means talking to the event planners far in advance.

[Scott L.]

Originally Posted by AV_guy007

As someone who has pushed webcasts up to NASA's servers its not the setup at the event that is very costly complicated. You need to consider what is serving the content. Do you have a powerful enough server with a fast enough connection? If not make sure to consider the costs of that..

Personally I would not pay for webcasting. I think a better idea would be to talk to people in the community who will be at events and get a network of people that can push a stream to your server, and share the content that way. there is no reason to pay for a crew to travel when there are already people there. Also don't forget you need a good Internet connection at the venue which usually means talking to the event planners far in advance.

we currently can't afford a faster Internet connection(DSL currently), but we are looking into faster options such as a T-1(~$350/month) If we could afford this every month it would allow us more freedom in what events we would be able to webcast, but this wouldn't guarantee that we would be able to archive 100% of the event and produce complete event DVDs, as we would be at the mercy of the person sending us the feed.
But this option would allow us to charge a lower rate to host the webcast.

[Cory]

Originally Posted by Scott L.

we currently can't afford a faster Internet connection(DSL currently), but we are looking into faster options such as a T-1(~$350/month) If we could afford this every month it would allow us more freedom in what events we would be able to webcast, but this wouldn't guarantee that we would be able to archive 100% of the event and produce complete event DVDs, as we would be at the mercy of the person sending us the feed.
But this option would allow us to charge a lower rate to host the webcast.

Scott,

If I'm hearing you right you're saying that someone at the event will feed you with video from the event, and you will use your servers to host it?

If this is the case, as I posted before, NASA is willing and able to do this for any team or individual that wishes to webcast an event. Such a team or individual would just need to obtain an internet connection at the event.

[Scott L.]

Originally Posted by Cory

Scott,

If I'm hearing you right you're saying that someone at the event will feed you with video from the event, and you will use your servers to host it?

If this is the case, as I posted before, NASA is willing and able to do this for any team or individual that wishes to webcast an event. Such a team or individual would just need to obtain an internet connection at the event.

I'm offering features such as chat, match results, rankings, event pictures posted during the event, event archive DVDs. Off season events is currently the events we would webcast.

[Vikesrock]

Was your last post implying that you would be attempting to serve a webcast over a DSL connection?

[Scott L.]

Originally Posted by Vikesrock

Was your last post implying that you would be attempting to serve a webcast over a DSL connection?

No, it was not, but because of this I bring the servers to the events venue to use the high speed internet.

BTW my intention of this thread was not to advertise, but to get a feel for what people would pay, and recommendations for services to offer, etc. Looking back I see that some of my posts seem to be advertising, but this was not my intention for starting the poll.
I am trying to form a media company and am using these forums as a form of market research.