|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Driving and "Traction controls"
The discussion has been very enlightening on the subject of programing. I don't want to discourage further program suggestions because our programmer is considering what you all have to say, but what do you all think about the idea of speed as it relates to what I am still calling "delay." If our traction control program sets a locked rate at which our robot can accelerate, then gearing it down (theoretically) won't matter. So in all of your minds, is it worth it to have the high speed capabilities? I already know that without traction control and lower gear ratios, the robot drives great. What speeds are your robots running at, and how well would you say it drives?
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Team 1293 "D5 Robotics" First Night of Driving! | R.Brown | Robot Showcase | 1 | 08-02-2008 06:47 |
| Congratulations is spelled with a "T" and not a "D"!! | Elgin Clock | Thanks and/or Congrats | 55 | 09-03-2007 13:24 |
| New NEMO White Papers! "Creating a Killer Packet" and "25 Ways to Sponsor" | Jessica Boucher | Team Organization | 0 | 10-08-2005 10:55 |
| Conflict between "Initialize_Tracker()" and "pwm13 & pwm15"? Kevin? | gnormhurst | Programming | 3 | 22-02-2004 02:55 |
| how tall is the ramp when in "up" and "balanced" position??? | archiver | 2001 | 1 | 24-06-2002 00:54 |