Car Nack Predicts #3-09

[Tom Bottiglieri]

I agree, but only because the perceived reward by most teams is very low.

We have plans to score points in autonomous mode. We feel there is a strategic benefit.

[ATannahill]

why is there not a #2 prediction?

[Mark McLeod]

#2 Prediction: http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...ad.php?t=75185

I predict that Car Nack has trouble counting...

[GaryVoshol]

Originally Posted by rtfgnow

why is there not a #2 prediction?

Originally Posted by Mark McLeod

#2 Prediction: http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...ad.php?t=75185

I predict that Car Nack has trouble counting...

I predict that Car Nack has trouble remembering his ID.

[bduddy]

I fear that, although the record of the great Car Nack is indeed impressive, he has gotten this one badly wrong by forgetting to take into account the teams that will unfortunately lack an autonomous mode...

[Wetzel]

Originally Posted by bduddy

I fear that, although the record of the great Car Nack is indeed impressive, he has gotten this one badly wrong by forgetting to take into account the teams that will unfortunately lack an autonomous mode...

If a team doesn't move in autonomous mode for more than one match, we will get them. Sitting duck code is so easy a Welshman could do it.

Wetzel

[Jared Russell]

As a programmer by trade, here is my thinking regarding why we won't try to score in autonomous:

-If we miss in autonomous, the team blames me
-If we miss in teleop, the team blames the drivers

[bduddy]

Any news on this? I wasn't able to watch very many matches...

[Vikesrock]

Originally Posted by rtfgnow

why is there not a #2 prediction?

There is now

[ATannahill]

Carnack is very delusive