|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Observations after week !
Which rule?
|
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Observations after week !
Refs at KC weren't enforcing <G21> properly. Apparently, they weren't issuing penalties for throwing ECs.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Observations after week !
My $0.02 on this game is that it can be really exciting, at times.
Matches where teams didnt show up, which i was extremely surprised was rather common at Midwest, make the match a cakewalk for the opposing alliance. If all you are is the kitbot frame and electronics thats fine. I can respect a team that at least goes out there and makes an effort; if you break down half way through the match, o well. To me, the supercells were important but not reliable. I only watched Midwest, and wasn't able to catch every qual match, but it seemed that, yes, while supercells won matches, they're not something that can be counted on. From what I saw the only reasonable way to score a SC is to throw it. Even then you have to hope there is an opponent near that human player, and they still have to make it. It is a good strategy to have the ability to use the SC, but if it takes you a while to acquire/dispense the EC then I advise you not to take on the EC transporter job. It was really cool to watch teams chase after a trailer and keep scoring on them without having to pin, which would make yourself a target. I applaud you on your driving. All in all i think this will be a great game, wish they had it last year so I would have been able to drive Can't wait to watch it in person at Florida. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Observations By the Numbers [<G14> - 11%]
I started this by just wanting to see how often G14 was applied in the eight regional events. In the qualification games, G14 came into effect only about 11% of the time. [NOTE: The only scores I found were AFTER Penalties were Assessed, I do not have the scores without penalties, so the numbers do not take into consideration the G14 prior to penalties, basically numbers might be off]
If my spreadsheet is correct here are the numbers: With about 86% of the scores reported: Qualification Games Number of Games: 577 Scores Reported: 495 Red wins: 255 Blue wins: 240 High Score: 151 Average Score: 50.55 Largest Point Differential: 126 G14 Penalties: No Penalty 437 (88%) 2x Penalty 21 (4%) 3x Penalty 37 (7%) Quarter Finals Number of Games: 73 Scores Reported: 73 Red wins: 45 Blue wins: 28 High Score: 126 Average Score: 60.10 Largest Point Differential: 68 G14 Penalties: No Penalty 68 (93%) 2x Penalty 4 (5%) 3x Penalty 1 (1%) Semi Finals Number of Games: 40 Scores Reported: 40 Red wins: 25 Blue wins: 15 High Score: 115 Average Score: 63.7 Largest Point Differential: 62 G14 Penalties: No Penalty 39 (97.5%) 2x Penalty 1 (2.5%) 3x Penalty 0 (0%) Finals Number of Games: 17 Scores Reported: 17 Red wins: 14 Blue wins: 3 High Score: 121 Average Score: 63.9 Largest Point Differential: 69 G14 Penalties: No Penalty 17 (100%) 2x Penalty 0 (0%) 3x Penalty 0 (0%) I would be really interested if someone could parse the Twitter information and report on all the great data contained in those posts. Last edited by davidfv : 01-03-2009 at 10:24. Reason: Major Note for the data, corrected number in Blue Wins in Semis |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Observations after week !
I attended the OKC regional and here are a few things I learned.
Make sure, you let the refs know if you are having any kind of communication problem with your robot. We lost signal with our robot in 3 separate matches. This possibly lost us our chance of being in the top 8 teams at the end of the qualification matches. Make sure your Payload specialist knows ALL of the rules that apply to them. So many teams (including a team in the finals) lost matches because of stupid mistakes by the PS's. Make sure your trailer hitch pin is set securely! During our first quarter final match, our robot was hit so hard in auto mode that our hitch pin flew out and our trailer came undone. The refs disabled and we lost the match because there was a free trailer. We had the pin in properly and everything, the head ref checked it before the match. So just because it looks and feels like its properly set... doesn't mean that it is... keep that in mind. When picking alliance partners after qualifying matches are over, make sure you have a list of teams you want to pick, even if your in 15th place, you may end up in the top 8. A lot of the top 8 teams picked from the other top 8. At our regional, supercells and strong defense were the way to go. Several teams did really well because all they did was get a few emptycells moved and then used team work to corral an opponent into their corner. Having the camera system on your robot will help you do well, but isn't essential to winning. The number 1 ranked robot had a really good camera targeting system on it. The number 2 robot didn't even have the camera on it. As was said before, having a good robot and a good human player is really important, but means nothing if you don't have a good strategy with your alliance partners. 3 basic robots with a good strategy can easily take down a great robot and its alliance if they don't have a strategy. I will keep adding as I think of things. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Observations By the Numbers [<G14> - 11%]
I don't know why that stat stands out to me, but it shows how the matches are even, or at least aren't soley decided by one dominant robot. The higher seeded alliance was only winning half the time in the semi-finals.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Observations By the Numbers [<G14> - 11%]
How do you know the higher seeded alliance wins half the time? This only shows red and blue wins.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Observations By the Numbers [<G14> - 11%]
In elimination rounds, the red alliance is the higher seed. The cited stat was from elims, not qualifiers.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Observations after week !
avoid two empty cells.
we had one in our system and trying to unload it we pushed another with our bumper... it was a penalty. and while super cells are a great life line, a strong alliance doesn't necessarily need them. |
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Observations By the Numbers [<G14> - 11%]
Quote:
If 1 loses to 8 in the quarters, 8 becomes red for every subsequent match they play in the elims. |
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Observations By the Numbers [<G14> - 11%]
Exactly. We were red in the finals at BAE, as the #4 seed, playing against the #2 seed.
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Observations By the Numbers [<G14> - 11%]
That is not true, At Midwest regional, in the semifinals the #8 seed alliance was red and the #4 was blue, and in the finals the #3 seed was blue and the #4 seed was red.
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Observations By the Numbers [<G14> - 11%]
red is always the higher seeded alliance in the elimination matches
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Observations after week !
Scouting is also exremly important in this years game. You must always know what teams have a good robot. At midwest everyone pretty much got a good first pick. but come 2nd pick some teams looked like they where digging deep trying to remember the number of the "one bot" they saw.
Ranking doesn't mean anything if you don't have a chance to be a allaince captian. stuff happens during the qualification matches that could drop a team out of the running to be in the top 8. Ill use my team as an example. at the midwest regionals we finished with a record of 2-6. but because team 135 had great scouting and didn't care that we where ranked 47 out of 53. They saw that in the beginning that yes we where not working right and had really bad luck. However we stabalized and where consistanltly a factor in our final 3 matches. They picked us and we then went with 135 and 2039 all the way to the finals. Long story short just because a team is ranked badly doesn't always mean they are a bad team. Thank you 135 for picking us to be on your alliance it was a great experience |
|
#15
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Observations By the Numbers [<G14> - 11%]
Yes, your numbers will be way off. In 78 qual matches at Traverse City (did you include us in your counts?), we had 6 penalty-adjusted matches that would look like <G14> applied, but it did not. And there was one match that would look like a 3x but was a 2x pre-penalty. We had 9 >2x and 2 >3x games in quals; 2 >2x and 2 >3x in QF's. None in SF's or F's.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Three observations on the game after UTC Scrimmage... | Justin | General Forum | 2 | 21-02-2006 09:43 |
| UTC Observations... | Tom Schindler | Regional Competitions | 2 | 19-03-2003 10:45 |
| Qotw [03-09-03]: Changes you want to make after week 1... | Ken Leung | Rumor Mill | 4 | 10-03-2003 12:38 |
| Life After Dean: Who Will Lead FIRST After Kamen and Flowers?? | Joe Matt | General Forum | 25 | 24-06-2002 00:12 |
| GLR Observations | archiver | 2000 | 5 | 23-06-2002 22:20 |