Go to Post For me Gracious Professionalism is about helping other teams make their ideas work. We do everything we can to help other teams program, or lend them parts from our pit. On the field we play to win. - Alpha Beta [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Old Forum Archives > 2001
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-06-2002, 02:36
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
About the division of teams at nationals . . .

Posted by Billy Mallard at 03/24/2001 10:20 PM EST


Student on team #254, the Cheesy Poofs, from Bellarmine College Prep and NASA.


In Reply to: Bridge Coming off the Fulcrum ...
Posted by Roly Anderson on 03/20/2001 8:55 AM EST:



: When dividing up the teams for the divisions at nationals, I think FIRST should split up the teams equally between the divisions according to their experience, as follows:
: Lets say for example that there are 100 teams with 3 years as a registered first team, 25 would be in each division. If there are 120 rookie teams, then put 30 in each division etc. They could even indicate on the divisional team lists, how many years experience each team has!

I assume that the proposed division of teams according to years of experience is in the spirit of making each section more or less even. But it would seem a bit unfair to automatically assume rookie teams to be less skilled than any other veteran team.

So i propose that, rather than dividing the sections according to years of involvement, they be divided according to the team's average score for all the regionals which they have attended. Now, i'm not sure whether FIRST keeps track of this, but it's an idea for future use. As far as i can tell, it's a good idea. Any thoughts?


__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Curie Division Robots information... (not complete) archiver 2001 3 24-06-2002 03:13
Team 111 Picture archiver 2001 18 24-06-2002 00:50
Wedge and Solenoids archiver 2001 3 24-06-2002 00:17
bridge specs archiver 2001 2 23-06-2002 22:52
Using Base 36 "Compression" For Easier Scouting and Other Interesting Tidbits Adrian Wong Rules/Strategy 9 21-09-2001 20:28


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:46.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi