[FTC]: Common failures with TETRIX

[PhilBot]

Originally Posted by jbbjjbt

2) Bending Axles. We haven't notice this. I believe the axles are steel

Well , they aren't magnetic, and they cut really easilly.

Just seem too soft for steel.

[Abra Cadabra IV]

We've had issues with the wobbly bushings, encoder cables, and the communication between the NXT and the motor controllers (the last of which lost us the final round at Los Angeles, argh). There's also been problems with the wires coming loose; crimping them onto the motors helped but there's not much we can do about the ones that fall out of the motor controllers even when fully tightened.

We've also had issues with the power switch, which is fine in most respects but needs to be far stiffer, as it can be turned off by a well-placed puck, not to mention another robot. (We thought we had ours in a spot where nobody could get at it. We were wrong.) A couple teams lost matches at Los Angeles last weekend due to robots accidentally getting turned off.

On the flip side, we now have several funny stories to tell regarding interesting failures...

[techedguy]

I actually just took apart a gearbox on the DC Gearmotors (it was stripped, or acted stripped, so why not) and found one of the pinion gears shattered. It is obviously a pressed powder/sinter type material. Anyone else experience this? Anyone know if there is a place to buy the gearboxes or gears for the gearboxes. It's hard to know the final dimensions of this gear because it is in about 6-7 pieces. It appears to be a 9-11 tooth gear.

[Rick TYler]

We've had a couple of gearheads fail, but haven't taken them apart. The bushing snapping off the end is more common.

[dooey100]

The gearbox broke once for us too...

after a younger member dropped it of the table, and it landed on the shaft. :O

[basicxman]

All four of my motors burned out, this really irritated me and I'm making sure this never happens again. I recommend having touch sensor bumpers around your robot to make sure your motors aren't stalling. I'd recommend not going past 60-80% motor power for a a few seconds.

Our axle heated up on the motor and is now force fitted onto my encoder and hub. Waste of a motor...

For a $25 dollar motor, and in a rough competition the motor tabs you hook up to, are way too thin and feeble. I lose a motor because of a lost tab. I am however happy.

I recommend checking over your motor and servo controller, the signals being sent to it, with a logic analyzer (I use the Saleae one, very good and affordable, http://www.saleae.com/logic/).

Queuing your controller takes way too long, I don't think a regional has gone by without FMS issues, they really need to improve this. Teams need to be enforced about the bluetooth rules and how your NXT should be prepped.

The lack of sensor ports is extremely limiting. LEGO Motors can be difficult to attach, I usually have to do it by a zip tie and a flimsy beam. Although proved that with regular NXT models the size and form of the NXT motors can be taken advantage of, it's just not right for Tetrix.

All of the wires should definitely be of a lower gauge. That being said some of them are of a low gauge and end up not fitting in the motor controller's terminals without crimping or trimming.

My complaints to HiTechnic on the motor controllers, although a great thing to have for NXT fans, these are poorly made and priced. It is not a professional motor controller, and is definitely not as industry standardish as the rest of the kit. It's a simple H-Bridge circuit with some power transistors! Maybe $10 dollars worth of parts, not $64 dollars!! And the lack of indicator LED's is frustrating.

As for the Tetrix metal, although I love it's amazing strength and extremely light weight, it's overkill for FTC. The hole pattern and sizes of tubes and channels are suiting, I was satisfied with those aspects. The amount of metal that came with the kit is extremely pleasing, I can build an entire competition robot with it.

I don't like the size of standoffs. 1" and 2" doesn't exactly fit the hole patterns and widths of channels. They should be 1.25 and 2.25".

Having to buy multi nut pliers separately as some form of wrench that the original kit lacked was a disappointment. As with Vex, a kit that's meant for a team of 3-10 only came with 1 set of hex wrenches. Luckily they were somewhat commonly available sizes.

We weren't told on what setting to charge the battery at. For many teams there was a punishment to FIRST's lack of documentation.

Although high resolution and lovely to program, the encoders are way overpriced.

Anybody else had their servo bushings (the axle thingy that attaches to the horn) ware out beyond repair? Although somewhat my fault ( ) this was a huge annoyance and the servo's were surprisingly weak (doesn't really match the whole "real world application robotics" theme).

There wasn't really a reliable way to attach the battery or the on/off switch. Zip ties worked but not really to satisfaction. I believe the kit came with one velcro strap to hold the battery in place. One doesn't exactly do the trick for the weight and size of the battery.

How often have you got a hub stuck on an axle and you have to yank it out with two heavy duty pliers? For strong metal gears the teeth sure ware out, luckily still working and pretty much no skipping yet I'm not sure how many months of competition they would last.

I think everybody has tried out the pivot bearings only to find out the screw is too small to fit through the required amount of metal!

Back to lego to metal connections. I hated how the hard point connectors was only wide enough to fit a lego beam in one orientation. They could've also had a different form of hard point connector where it fits between two beams (i.e. the bottom of a lego motor).

Final complaint, how many people got their design screwed over by the backorder of motor contollers???

Sorry for the overly long post. Enjoy?

[dooey100]

We used a dual servo mount for our battery holder, plus 2 zip ties and it was very sturdy.

That reminds me of another issue: We originally had our battery resting on two bolts. Probably a bad idea, because it shorted and caused the battery to heat up melt the blue plastic insulation.

We used the pivot bearings in our robot at one time, are you using them as suggested in the instruction manual?

[basicxman]

Originally Posted by dooey100

We used a dual servo mount for our battery holder, plus 2 zip ties and it was very sturdy.

That reminds me of another issue: We originally had our battery resting on two bolts. Probably a bad idea, because it shorted and caused the battery to heat up melt the blue plastic insulation.

We used the pivot bearings in our robot at one time, are you using them as suggested in the instruction manual?

First off, great idea! (battery holder) and wise warning

Yes I'm using the pivot bearings as instructed, maybe an isolated incident?

[dooey100]

Perhaps. Do you mean the screw went all the way through the center of the bearing? Or through the small holes on the servo mount? None of our bearings had that problem, and if all of yours did that would be a huge coincidence.

[basicxman]

I actually have a few unopened packages of bearings i haven't tried yet. So it could really well be an isolated incident. For clarification, the screw went through the bearing and metal but wasn't able to make it through the servo bracket. I'll post a picture perhaps (lol if I kept the "mismanufactured" bearing set)

[Abra Cadabra IV]

The pivot bearings are useless for everything EXCEPT what they're used for in the manual. Most metal is just way too thick for the length of the screw; it only really works with the really thin stuff. It's sad, because there's so much we could have done with it...

[Buzz2001]

I think I saw the answer already, so forgive me for asking directly -- will the servo burn out if stalled? We are using it to run our claw & depending on how the ring nests it may not close entirely, stalling the servo. I am thinking we will need a spring relief for this. What do you all think?