Invite Obama to Atlanta, we already did

[dani190]

Originally Posted by Tom Hand

From Team 1987 who fired off letter Jan 4th or so:

With our 400-500 letters sent this year, we have had responses from Kit Bond, Matt Bartle, and now Mr. Obama. The reply came through email to our mentor, Mr. H.

Here it it:
“Thank you for inviting President Obama to attend the Kansas City Regional FIRST Robotics Competition.

The President values each and every invitation, but due to time constraints, he must decline the majority he receives. We have reviewed your invitation, and unfortunately, the President will be unable to attend.

As you noted in your letter, President Obama has sought to prioritize science and math education and teacher recruitment. As he has said, “We need to recruit an army of new teachers. I’ll make this pledge: If you commit your life to teaching, America will pay for your college education. We’ll recruit teachers in math and science, and deploy them to under-staffed school districts in our inner cities and rural America. We’ll expand mentoring programs that pair experienced teachers with new recruits. And when our teachers succeed, I won’t just talk about how great they are—I’ll reward their greatness with better pay and more support.” We thank you for partnering in this pursuit as a science and math mentor, and we appreciate your understanding. We thank you and your organization for your contributions in this pursuit, and we appreciate your understanding.

Sincerely,

The White House Scheduling Department”

wonder what he will say to the atlanta dates...

[NorviewsVeteran]

Originally Posted by dani190

wonder what he will say to the atlanta dates...

Hopefully the "world" parts will grab his attention better.

To be brutally honest, I doubt any current president will be able to attend Champs. Here's my reasoning:

A. It's open to the general public. This makes security an even larger nightmare.
B. Teams enter and exit with toolcrates constantly. This creates a security environment that is inoperable for a president. It would be disturbingly easy to smuggle a firearm into a FRC competition, hence the lack of likely hood of his attending.
C. We're not big enough. This is the president we're talking about here, folks. This is the most powerful man in the world. We aren't big enough yet. We're close, but this is the man who single-handedly packs millions for speeches.

[Trent B]

http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/blog/bal...urn=nba,145551

If that isn't a similar security problem I dont know what is.

[SU 39]

Originally Posted by Trent B

http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/blog/bal...urn=nba,145551

If that isn't a similar security problem I dont know what is.

It is nowhere near that situation. Obama did not just show up unannounced at the game. The security to get in the arena there would definitely have been turned up a bit. At the Championships, people can come and go as they please, definitely too much of a security risk. While it would be nice to see Obama in Atlanta, it would probably be safer (for him) and more efficient (for the event) if it was just something like a pre-recorded video.

[MattLi]

Wait how about a live webcast? He could talk to us from the white house. He'd never have to leave.

I've already sent an email to my team talking about sending letters.

[cbale2000]

Originally Posted by CraigHickman

To be brutally honest, I doubt any current president will be able to attend Champs. Here's my reasoning:

A. It's open to the general public. This makes security an even larger nightmare.
B. Teams enter and exit with toolcrates constantly. This creates a security environment that is inoperable for a president. It would be disturbingly easy to smuggle a firearm into a FRC competition, hence the lack of likely hood of his attending.
C. We're not big enough. This is the president we're talking about here, folks. This is the most powerful man in the world. We aren't big enough yet. We're close, but this is the man who single-handedly packs millions for speeches.

I agree with your rational, but I will also point out that last year when George Bush Sr. Spoke at nationals no one really knew about it ahead of time.

My guess is that sort of planning could be used, because if there is no way of knowing if he will show up, no one will plan for it. This generally would make security much easier (Again, note the security detail at the event when George Bush Sr. was in Atlanta, it seemed to me to be quite light, even if he is an ex-president).


My 2cents anyways, I'm sure there are plenty of good reasons for him not to come, but I wouldn't rule it out completely. And there's always Deans plan of taking everyone to the Washington mall in a few years too.

Originally Posted by cbale2000

I agree with your rational, but I will also point out that last year when George Bush Sr. Spoke at nationals no one really knew about it ahead of time.

My guess is that sort of planning could be used, because if there is no way of knowing if he will show up, no one will plan for it. This generally would make security much easier (Again, note the security detail at the event when George Bush Sr. was in Atlanta, it seemed to me to be quite light, even if he is an ex-president).


My 2cents anyways, I'm sure there are plenty of good reasons for him not to come, but I wouldn't rule it out completely. And there's always Deans plan of taking everyone to the Washington mall in a few years too.

Bush Senior isn't a president anymore, so he doesn't have too many current enemies.

[BJT]

the security for a presidential visit would SCREW UP the entire event. nobody could get into the arena that entire day without being searched. it's a nice thought, but I don't really think it's possible.

[MattLi]

Ok while I agree with you people that security will be an issue, I don't believe it's completely impossible for him to show. Honestly, he could just probably show up unannounced and FIRST will let him speak. I mean he is the president after all. Also, last time I checked, no one at FIRST has a burning desire to bring any firearms to the Georgia Dome for a robotics competition. He could just show up, his security lock down the Dome, and then leave. No one would expect anything, so there would be no risk of random assassins bringing snipers to the event.

[Viper37]

Originally Posted by CraigHickman

C. We're not big enough. This is the president we're talking about here, folks. This is the most powerful man in the world. We aren't big enough yet. We're close, but this is the man who single-handedly packs millions for speeches.

That's the one that came to my mind first. Pardon the pun.

[Molten]

I don't know. Personally, I don't think he belongs there. He should be writing laws and negotiating with other countries. FIRST is very important to me and to many others, but it really is not the most important thing for this country. Let Obama fix the economy, then he can worry about robotics. Afterall, with engineering outlook, that would be doing us all a huge favor.

[artdutra04]

Originally Posted by Molten

I don't know. Personally, I don't think he belongs there. He should be writing laws and negotiating with other countries. FIRST is very important to me and to many others, but it really is not the most important thing for this country. Let Obama fix the economy, then he can worry about robotics. Afterall, with engineering outlook, that would be doing us all a huge favor.

Just a heads up, the President doesn't write laws, elected officials in Congress do.

[ZakuAce]

Originally Posted by artdutra04

Just a heads up, the President doesn't write laws, elected officials in Congress do.

Executive Orders?

I too believe that fixing the economy is top priority. Maybe he could send a cabinet member, maybe VP Biden? But honestly, this country has more problems. I'd say more but I too don't want to get political. Flame wars suck!

[Viper37]

Originally Posted by Molten

Let Obama try to fix the economy, then he can worry about robotics.

Fixed.