|
|
|
 ...remember, this is coming from someone that spent the better part of an afternoon playing with an omniwheel--not assembling, not disassembling, just playing. - Billfred [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#11
16-03-2009, 09:58
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 848 Puts a Massive Pin on 399
Why would there be a penalty for this, especially on 848? 848 has "four wheels on the floor" and is initiating contact within its own bumper zone. To add insult to injury, it looks like 399 could have been flagged for either a height violation or the bumpers being out of the bumper zone when tipped (though 848 probably caused 399 to violate these rules, so no penalties would be the correct call).
Obviously I wasn't there, so I don't want to ruffle any feathers, but from *this picture alone*, I don't see what 848 did wrong. <G32>, especially sections B, C, and D, does not explicitly outlaw this type of defense in my opinion (unless 848 used some sort of wedge to get 399 off the ground). Last edited by Jared Russell : 16-03-2009 at 10:09. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| pic: 399 on the Move With a Full Load | Drwurm | Extra Discussion | 11 | 19-03-2009 09:41 |
| pic: 973 pursuing 399 | Drwurm | Extra Discussion | 2 | 16-03-2009 10:27 |
| pic: Team 399 Tin Man | robodude03 | Extra Discussion | 4 | 30-01-2009 21:37 |
| pic: Team 399 - Los Angeles Chairman's Award Winners | Brad Voracek | Extra Discussion | 6 | 06-04-2007 20:34 |
| pic: Team 399 in Action! | robodude03 | Robot Showcase | 7 | 04-03-2006 22:31 |
Threaded Mode