|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2009 High Scores
When you think about the fact that each trailer only (reliably) holds 20-25 balls, it makes sense that we only see a high score of 151. Actually, my prediction is that we'll never see a score above 172 under the current scoring setup ... not even at IRI.
|
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2009 High Scores
Quote:
172 points is a lot. The only reason we had that high score is because the 1) we were with the Beast 2) I think one bot didn't show up and 3) one bot wasn't functioning. Its nice to say we hold the highest score even if the odds were in our favor. And just because I'm bored of computer concepts...if i did my math correctly by having 24 moon rocks in each oppenents trailer and every super cell was scored you could get 204 points...if my math is correct ![]() |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2009 High Scores
[edit nevermind I can't do math either, so I guess your right]
24*3*2 + 4*15 = 204 pts So you guys are only 74% there. You guys have a few weeks till the championship so get to work on achieving the last 26%! ... now back to work Last edited by Chris27 : 20-03-2009 at 16:53. Reason: hey I never claimed to be a Mathematician |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2009 High Scores
180 seems like the highest of the highest. 60 points for 4 super cells, plus 120 points for 20 moon rocks scored in each of the three trailers.
151 is a very incredible score and while I don't doubt that teams could reach 160 or 170, I find it unlikely that teams can break far past the 151 mark - probably ending in the range of 151-156 |
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2009 High Scores
the high score at peachtree was 108 with teams 343, 1771, and 57. unfortunatly, this could have been higher because we did not play a smooth match =P
|
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2009 High Scores
It'd be a neat thing to do at offseason (especially IRI) to put the top three seeds on the field against 3 robotless trailers. Haphazardly dump the opposing "alliance"'s balls on the floor, and set up the top 3 seeds as per usually. Then watch 2 minutes and 15 seconds of chaos.
![]() |
|
#22
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2009 High Scores
Quote:
Robot version: Without a trailer or defense, score as much as you like for 2 minutes. |
|
#23
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2009 High Scores
Quote:
2 of them didnt have an auto mode however Plus that 151 was still actually a 161 in total points, 10 point human player penalty According to our scouts(all 12 of them); we(1625) put in 37 balls(woot), 71 put in 21 balls, and 2741 gets props for a supercell, and human players did the rest. |
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2009 High Scores
Teams 40, 2079, and 2199 just set a high score for week 4 with a score of 142 at the Chesapeake Regional.
Last edited by J_Greco : 21-03-2009 at 11:06. |
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2009 High Scores
I think that a defense will play a big factor in the later regionals. One thing to keep in mind is that during qualifications matches (when a strong alliance might have an easier time running the score up), teams are interested in increasing their ranking score and will score on their own alliance to improve their seeding position. Oddly this ends up hurting many of the other ranking and scouting statistics. The teams that thoroughly understand the strategy required for this game will not try to run up the score during qualifications.
Our strategy is to leave a 30-40 point lead (when we are lucky enough to get it) to prevent a last minute loss due to super cells. After that we will score on our own alliance. During eliminations you want the margin to be double the opposing alliances score minus 1 to prevent empty cell penalty. |
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2009 High Scores
HIGH SCORES WEEK 1Midwest: Qualification 29: 151 WEEK 2 Finger Lakes: Final Match 2: 131 WEEK 3 MI - Cass Tech: Qualification 42: 139 WEEK 4 Chesapeake: Qualification 57: 142 CUMULATIVE HIGH SCORES WEEK 1: DC, QF1-1: 226 Red Alliance 126- Blue Alliance 100 WEEK 2: ROC, QF3-1: 175 Red Alliance 83 - Blue Alliance 92 WEEK 3: SJ, SF1-2: 177 Red Alliance 108 - Blue Alliance 69 WEEK 4 MD, Q57: 210 Red Alliance 68 - Blue Alliance 142 MD, QF3-2: 210 Red Alliance: 130 - Blue Alliance 80 |
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2009 High Scores
Qualification match # 57 at Chesapeake also totaled 210 in week 4. Red 68 - Blue 142
|
|
#28
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2009 High Scores
Quote:
It's just a lot easier to abbreviate Maryland than Chesapeake. |
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2009 High Scores
team #'s 188, 1241 and 2076 scored 141 points in qualification #61 at GTR!
Last edited by AKaul : 29-03-2009 at 09:18. |
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2009 High Scores
High score of 131 by 399, 1332, 2996 in the quarter finals at Colorado
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| High Scores | cbudrecki | General Forum | 112 | 24-03-2015 09:43 |
| Week 1 High Scores | Cuse | Regional Competitions | 15 | 01-03-2009 23:09 |
| High Scores for matches | Jazonk | General Forum | 12 | 22-07-2008 10:58 |
| 05 World Wide High Scores | team222badbrad | General Forum | 156 | 12-05-2005 12:10 |
| High Tetris Scores | MarkF | Chit-Chat | 9 | 08-01-2003 22:23 |