|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Scouting: Diamond in the Rough
Quote:
|
|
#17
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Scouting: Diamond in the Rough
Quote:
|
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Scouting: Diamond in the Rough
Anyone remember 2007 Championships? 8th seeded alliance from Newton won it all. 190 Was ranked 9th and then moved up to 8th seed. 987 was ranked in the upper 30's and I'm not sure where 177 was.
Goes to show that alliance number doesnt always translte into wins. |
|
#19
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Scouting: Diamond in the Rough
Quote:
From personal experience this year, 190 found an great partner in 1099 at Boston, who were instrumental in getting us through semis against the beast that is 1153. 971 was also elated to be able to pick 852 again at SVR, who kept 668 in a corner during semis and never let 1280 score in the finals. I would also say that 1868 (who were finalists at SVR with 192 and 1280) shouldn't have lasted that long in the draft. They are an excellent team with a quality robot and top-notch driving (and from what I hear, were even more formidable at Davis with the improved collector). Keep an eye out for these girls at championships, they may be one of those diamonds.....(if they don't do well enough to pick up a few themselves) |
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Scouting: Diamond in the Rough
Quote:
that they were still there when the picks came back around to us. we definitely wouldnt have won without them and theyre incredible pinning and scoring ability. |
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Scouting: Diamond in the Rough
Quote:
See Ya At EMU!!! |
|
#22
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Scouting: Diamond in the Rough
For us those picks have been teams either dramatically improve on Saturday or got missed by everyone else.
In 2006 at the Hartford regional our selection of 1124, the Uberbots who everyone over looked they were seeded around 40 but showed smart play and great capabilities on the field to play our strategy, with a durable robot and great drivers. Also in 2006 at the Championship we got a second round steal in the Galileo draft from the #2 seed when we added the FEDS, 201, to round out our alliance with 1126, SPARX. Everyone else missed their great auto mode and consistent shooter so they slipped to us at the 23rd overall pick and were seeded up the 60s I believe. The FEDS auto mode helped us complete 13 straight victories on the Galileo and 1 on Einstein before the Newton alliance knocked us out. Also In Hartford Saturday we agree Bacon slipped too far. |
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Scouting: Diamond in the Rough
My senior year on 93 in 2005 we were dead last after qualifications at Boilermaker, but got picked by 135 in the 2nd round and made it to the finals. We pushed the #1 seeded team to 4 matches and almost won.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Scouting Made Easy - Announcing the FIRST Scouting Network | Adam Richards | Scouting | 24 | 17-11-2007 14:58 |
| Rough Draft | pras870 | 3D Animation and Competition | 1 | 18-01-2004 20:45 |
| Diamond Plating on sides considered being on the field? | animater31405 | Rules/Strategy | 4 | 12-01-2004 18:33 |
| SCOUTING threads Go in the SCOUTING forum -- They will be __DELETED__ from General! | Brandon Martus | General Forum | 3 | 19-02-2003 22:05 |
| How do you tell whether your sensor is detecting a crate or the diamond plate? | Greg Ross | Technical Discussion | 4 | 13-01-2003 19:02 |