|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#91
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Top Bots for 2009?
I believe 1625 would be classified as a power dumper because of bottom belting.
|
|
#92
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Top Bots for 2009?
Quote:
![]() |
|
#93
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Top Bots for 2009?
Quote:
If so, then 234 and 2068 aren't gravity dumpers either (both also use similar scoring methods). |
|
#94
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Top Bots for 2009?
I always considered those as power dumpers, IE using the aid of rollers and such.
Sorry I never got to see your performance at AZ. Heard it was sick though. Added to shooters 1726. |
|
#95
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Top Bots for 2009?
We are not relying soley on gravity, hence not a gravity dumper.
We classify ourselves as a power dumper |
|
#96
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Top Bots for 2009?
Only Seen Michigan Teams but i think 217 is amazing.
469 910 both great scorers with agility. And the Big GM four are all great this year 65 66 67 68 Especially 67 but Everyone knows that already Can't wait to see the out of state teams! |
|
#97
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Top Bots for 2009?
I used OPRNet to throw the rankings for all the regionals into a spreadsheet, and sorted by OPR. These numbers are for one competition each; I don't have full-season numbers (yet).
OPR can be interpreted as a team's average contribution to their alliance's score; these numbers only include qualifying matches (afaik). Top 25 is arbitrary. Code:
Team OPR SAA PM RPI Regional Result 1 71 63.55 13.69 49.86 0.54 Midwest Loss 2 67 55.25 7.51 47.73 0.61 Lansing, MI Win 3 188 54.85 20.13 34.71 0.58 Finger Lakes Win 4 399 53.89 5.26 48.63 0.57 Colorado Win 5 968 52.85 12.82 40.03 0.61 San Diego Loss 6 694 51.29 10.4 40.89 0.54 Connecticut Loss 7 67 50.94 0.62 50.32 0.58 Cass Tech, MI Win 8 217 49.07 16.26 32.81 0.59 Troy, MI Win 9 2056 48.89 8.99 39.91 0.59 Greater Toronto Win 10 1625 48.82 13.99 34.83 0.54 Midwest Win 11 399 48.57 6.64 41.93 0.61 Los Angeles Loss 12 694 48.45 16.43 32.02 0.52 New York Loss 13 103 47.67 1.65 46.02 0.59 Florida Loss 14 2877 47.59 13.4 34.18 0.52 Connecticut Loss 15 121 47.19 8.28 38.91 0.60 Connecticut Loss 16 2056 45.29 3.27 42.03 0.58 Waterloo Win 17 67 44.74 11.52 33.22 0.56 Troy, MI Win 18 2199 44.74 26.5 18.24 0.54 Washington DC Loss 19 1279 44.29 19.23 25.06 0.56 Philadelphia Loss 20 1622 44.21 10.39 33.82 0.56 San Diego Loss 21 188 43.64 23.98 19.66 0.54 Greater Toronto Loss 22 395 43.35 9.06 34.29 0.5 Philadelphia Win 23 1625 43.32 14.14 29.18 0.55 Wisconsin Win 24 1218 43.22 12.76 30.47 0.54 Pittsburgh Win 25 1114 43.18 11.25 31.93 0.58 Midwest Loss - 67's dominance is supported not just by their top notch OPR appearing three times, but also by their consistently high RPI. They had to play tough teams. - 67 (#2,7,17), 188 (#3,21), 399 (#4,11), 694 (#6,12), 1625 (#10, 23), 2056 (#9,16) appeared in the top 25 OPR multiple times. Some slightly off topic statistics: - 18 different teams appeared in the top 25 OPR. - After these performances high scoring performances, 12/25 went on to win the regional. - 13/18 teams will be going to Atlanta (Assuming usfirst.org's championship team list is currently up to date). 103, 694, 968, 1279, 2199 will not be there. Last edited by Goldeye : 31-03-2009 at 00:19. Reason: 399 says they will be going to Atlanta; also, formatting fix |
|
#98
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Top Bots for 2009?
Team 1345 worked closely with Team 179 this season. We built a twin. Both of our robots are gravity dumpers. The "rotation" of the basket throws the moonrocks into the trailer.
|
|
#99
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Top Bots for 2009?
Quote:
and did u see that smash on BOB durning the finals? it bent out frame and broke it in another place. GO 216,1918, 1254!!!! |
|
#100
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Top Bots for 2009?
See thread "1625 Radical Redesign"
I think they're up to something. |
|
#101
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Top Bots for 2009?
[quote=rees2001;841334]I'm going to throw a vote in for 1507. A team that will not be at Championship. They were 12-2-2 at FLR (both losses came in elims), 10-4-0 at Philly, (2 of 4 losses came in elims vs 56 365 395).
Rees Appreciate the vote but we just booked the Courtyard Marriott Atlanta Cumberland Centre! We've also got a bus so we'll definately be in Atlanta. Hope to see you there! |
|
#102
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Top Bots for 2009?
67-85-216-217-1918
These above five all looked great and have won a Michigan Regional this year. |
|
#103
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Top Bots for 2009?
For me, the best herder was 2200, it was a giant yellow box with a roller on the front and at the Waterloo Regional, they were nicknamed the Empty Cell Kings. I saw in one game, they got an empty cell in the fueling station in under 20 seconds. They also had a really good autonomous period strategy, go to the centre and spin for a random amount of time. Their thrower was also really good.
|
|
#104
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Top Bots for 2009?
Quote:
Last edited by davidfv : 30-03-2009 at 12:45. |
|
#105
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Top Bots for 2009?
399 will be in Atlanta. No worries. =) Being on that list is pretty sweet...
Last edited by Brad Voracek : 30-03-2009 at 13:23. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Top Ten Things NOT to do with the 2009 FRC Control System | Vince | FRC Control System | 9 | 16-12-2008 17:08 |
| Top 5 Bots per Division-Einstein Predictions | Corey Balint | Championship Event | 63 | 24-04-2006 20:19 |
| Top Ten Bots of 2000 | archiver | 2000 | 25 | 23-06-2002 23:09 |
| All these mouse bots gives me an evil idea- CAT BOTS! | Patrick Wang | General Forum | 2 | 09-03-2002 22:43 |
| FOR NJ BOTS | arctic warrior | Regional Competitions | 2 | 26-02-2002 14:40 |