|
|
|
 Everyone better enjoy the broadcast, Dave had to cancel a shuttle launch to make it happen :D - The Lucas [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating: 
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
| Everyone better enjoy the broadcast, Dave had to cancel a shuttle launch to make it happen :D - The Lucas [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#13
03-04-2009, 13:22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: paper: New Scouting Database from Team 2834
I have read a bit about this method of generating OPR and I was curious about your input for the Seattle Regional. My team, 488 ranks quite low on OPR and average score, but multiple teams of scouts confirmed we were in the top few for average scoring per match including human and robot scoring. I would say 3 of the top 5 scorers are ranked below 10 for opr. There are teams ranked in the top 10 that we did not record scoring a ball during the entire event. Is this biased based on strength of schedule or something like that? I would love to use this tool in ATL, but having my own experience at a regional, I need to know how far to trust this data.
Thanks! 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| paper: 2007 Championship Event Scouting Database, presented by Team 1114 | Karthik | Extra Discussion | 18 | 10-04-2007 17:02 |
| paper: Waterloo Regional Scouting Database | astephen68 | Extra Discussion | 3 | 04-03-2007 19:34 |
| paper: Scoring for scouting database | wheeler | Extra Discussion | 1 | 27-01-2007 15:56 |
| paper: 2006 Excel Scouting database | Greg Needel | Scouting | 11 | 20-04-2006 21:41 |
| White Paper Discuss: Scouting database | Marjory Frosty | Extra Discussion | 0 | 08-01-2006 19:03 |
Threaded Mode