Go to Post A couple of times during our matches, our HOSTBOT had a GAME PIECE right there ready to HANG, but the darn PEG dodged out of the way - MrForbes [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Old Forum Archives > 2001
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-06-2002, 03:21
archiver archiver is offline
Forum Archival System
#0047 (ChiefDelphi)
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pontiac, MI
Posts: 21,214
archiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond reputearchiver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The meaning behind the game.......

Posted by Matt Leese at 04/10/2001 4:05 PM EST


Other on team #73, Tigerbolt, from Edison Technical HS and Alstom & Fiber Technologies & RIT.


In Reply to: Re: The meaning behind the game.......
Posted by Justin Hirt on 04/10/2001 2:34 PM EST:



: #2) To screw over Chief Delphi and other engineer
: run teams. They tried to create a game where you
: don't have to have a engineer built robot to win

Ok, I take offense to this. First of all, I don't know of any teams run completely by engineers. You know why? Because it'd be pointless to do so. Because the whole point of FIRST is to encourage engineering and having students sit and watch doesn't accomplish that. What you might have wanted to say is teams that have more money but that isn't true either. Money has very little to do with designing a good robot it just ends up that the programs with the most involved people have the most money -- not vice-versa. Second, FIRST is agnostic to who does the construction and designing. They're more interested in encouraging science, math, and engineering. However, it is the general consensus (as far as I can tell) that the best way to go about it is to have engineers working with students on the robot. Neither students working alone nor engineers working alone. And I bet that there's a fair chance you would've thought my team's robot was engineer built. Well, guess what, it was almost completely built by students (the rest being done by teachers). We had zero engineers. It just happens that our students happen to be excellent machinists. I'm sorry for ranting but that comment just set me off.

Matt

__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2002 game prediction contest!!! Ken Leung Rumor Mill 41 31-12-2007 18:18
What changes to this year's game...? DougHogg General Forum 16 20-04-2003 15:35
"Rigging" the game vs playing the game strategically - what's the difference? ColleenShaver Rules/Strategy 13 15-01-2003 10:33
Ok, so YOU design the 2003 game... dlavery General Forum 157 07-01-2003 23:55
Next year: Make the game understandable archiver 1999 23 23-06-2002 22:53


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 23:02.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi