|
Re: The "complicated" scoring system
Posted by Pamela at 04/10/2001 10:14 PM EST
Student on team #166, Techno Insanity, from Merrimack High School and Texas Instruments.
In Reply to: Re: The "complicated" scoring system
Posted by Chris Orimoto on 04/10/2001 9:25 PM EST:
I don't think the scoring this year was all that bad, if you knew the rules it was pretty easy math to do in your head real quick! I personally liked last years game and scoring system better, this years game, I felt, took away alot of excitement from the whole "competition". Last years game made teams go head to head agianst one another, yet you still needed to help out your opposing alliance in order for your team to get high scores. I liked having 2 on 2 alliances, it added excitement and kept more dynamics in the game, because not only did you have to worry about your robots performance, you had to think about what you could graciously do to try and stop the other alliance from beating you. One other thought: Why does animation recieve such little acknowledgement? They work just as hard if not harder sitting there and meticulosly designing and animating every litlle bit and piece which goes into their animation, I feel the deserve more recognition!
Pamela 166
__________________
This message was archived from an earlier forum system. Some information may have been left out. Start new discussion in the current forums, and refer back to these threads when necessary.
|