|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Divisions posted
That's a lot of teams for us to scout!
|
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Divisions posted
Archimedes looks very canadian
|
|
#18
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Divisions posted
Galileo = Redonculous
![]() |
|
#19
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Divisions posted
That was one of my first thoughts too. I could easily see an all-Canadian alliance taking the divisional banner.
|
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Divisions posted
Actually I was thinking more of a Floridian alliance ;-)
|
|
#21
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Divisions posted
I think you mean an alliance composed of a Michigan, a Florida, and a Canadian team
![]() |
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Divisions posted
Yay!
|
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Divisions posted
Here are my predictions for two members of each winning alliance, and one of each finalist:
Archimedes: 1114/2056 over 624 Curie: 217/254 over 79 Galileo: 67/71 over 45 Newton: 234/1625 over 148 |
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Divisions posted
Woo, time to make a very distant and probably completely inaccurate prediction! Einstein alliances!
Archimedes: 1114 & 2056 Curie: 217 & 68 Galileo: 71 & 67 Newton: 1625 & 121 Galileo vs. Newton determine the champ (leaning towards Galileo) Last edited by lukevanoort : 08-04-2009 at 13:15. Reason: didn't see 2056 in Archimedes... |
|
#25
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Divisions posted
I would say 67/71 and BACOONNN!! 1902
|
|
#26
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Divisions posted
I counted 40 wins (!) for Curie.
|
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Divisions posted
Would that be called "HOT Hammond Bacon"??
|
|
#28
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Divisions posted
Sign me up for that!!!
|
|
#29
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Divisions posted
or Beastly Hot Bacon.....lol
|
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Divisions posted
Whoever gets out of Galileo isn't going to have an easy time with it. I have a feeling there will be a lot of "breaking up" of good alliances to level the playing field in the division, but it will ultimately hurt the alliance when they get to Einstein.
Curie 2007 was a prime example of this. 330 and 1114 could have gotten together and left Einstein in ruins. However, a team ranked above 330 and kept that alliance from forming. 330 ultimately won the division, but were defeated on Einstein in two matches. In any case, there are enough very strong teams where they can still defeat the Newton alliance champions on Einstein. Newton isn't nearly as deep as Galileo, but they still carry a lot of weight with 234, 1625, and 148, to name a few. If the right teams rank in the right spots, Galileo may have their second championship in two years. Losing only one match during the entire Michigan State Championship is incredibly impressive. 217 will probably take the Curie title, and go on to play Galileo in the finals. Who wins from there is all up to whether the right teams rank in the right spots in their respective divisions. I'm going to say Galileo has the favor. Archimedes has a chance in the semi-finals if things don't go as planned in Curie. Yeah, they have 1114 and 2056. When together, these teams have won every regional. However, this game is prone to upsets, so who knows exactly what we'll see? |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Divisions | Bill Beatty | General Forum | 2 | 15-04-2006 11:24 |
| Divisions out???? | Brandon Holley | General Forum | 2 | 10-04-2006 18:45 |
| Divisions at Nationals | archiver | 2001 | 0 | 24-06-2002 04:11 |
| Divisions | shelves4 | Championship Event | 44 | 13-04-2002 23:10 |
| Divisions | Tom | Championship Event | 2 | 10-04-2002 21:23 |