|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: **FIRST EMAIL**/SharingFIRST
Joe you raise an interesting point, these various sites do have somewhat similar goals in the broadest sense. It seems it would have been more efficient to build one site with 3 separate sub-sections. Now, the other main problem I have, the interfaces are not even similar. If FIRST wanted multiple sites the least they could have done was pick a similar interface even if they had different color schemes. That way when you learn one site it becomes simple to move to another when you want to. As it is there is a barrier to their use.
That minor complaint voiced, I had no idea any of these 3 sites existed. Thank you for sharing. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| **FIRST EMAIL**/FIRST Annual Fund Message from James R. Utaski, FIRST Board of Direct | miketwalker | FIRST E-Mail Blast Archive | 0 | 27-05-2004 11:25 |
| SharingFirst is back up !!! | archiver | 2001 | 1 | 23-06-2002 23:19 |
| SharingFirst down? | archiver | 2001 | 1 | 23-06-2002 23:05 |
| SharingFIRST Website | archiver | 2000 | 0 | 23-06-2002 22:30 |
| SharingFIRST | David Kelly | General Forum | 3 | 08-08-2001 14:13 |