|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Another idea for future competitions
Posted by Kris Verdeyen at 04/13/2001 12:09 AM EST
Engineer on team #118, Robonauts, from CCISD and NASA - Johnson Space Center and Friends. In Reply to: Re: Another idea for future competitions Posted by Michael Betts on 04/12/2001 7:33 PM EST: I agree wholeheartedly with Mike. There's no reason that we couldn't simply _allow_ more freedom while keeping the basics the same for those teams that choose not to expand into that arena. : :...The main reason we have such strict wiring rules is the fact that so many teams have problems with wiring. Because of this I doubt we'll see an increased EE/CE/CS component of the competition. : Matt, : People have problems with gear ratios and the concept of a fastener. Maybe we should do away with them as well... I'm only kidding (I think). : Seriously, raise the bar and people will step up. : Electron Jockey Mike |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A report on off season competitions | Ken Leung | Off-Season Events | 2 | 17-10-2003 13:30 |
| QotW [04-20-03]: Post-season competitions. | Madison | Rumor Mill | 16 | 26-04-2003 01:27 |
| An idea for the 2000 games..(is six weeks enough?) | archiver | 1999 | 18 | 23-06-2002 23:17 |
| Another idea looking for comments | archiver | 1999 | 16 | 23-06-2002 22:01 |
| great storyboard idea | SharkBite | 3D Animation and Competition | 0 | 15-01-2002 20:39 |