Match Schedule: Galileo

[Vikesrock]

Archimedes: http://www2.usfirst.org/2009comp/eve...edulequal.html
Curie: http://www2.usfirst.org/2009comp/eve...edulequal.html
Galileo: http://www2.usfirst.org/2009comp/eve...edulequal.html
Newton: http://www2.usfirst.org/2009comp/eve...edulequal.html

I found these by using www.frclinks.com

I used the query /e/s/"divsion code"
The division codes are listed on that webpage

[cziggy343]

Originally Posted by Vikesrock

Archimedes: http://www2.usfirst.org/2009comp/eve...edulequal.html
Curie: http://www2.usfirst.org/2009comp/eve...edulequal.html
Galileo: http://www2.usfirst.org/2009comp/eve...edulequal.html
Newton: http://www2.usfirst.org/2009comp/eve...edulequal.html

I found these by using www.frclinks.com

I used the query /e/s/"divsion code"
The division codes are listed on that webpage

thank you

[Jim Meyer]

I combined the match schedule with the CCWM and generated the following ranking prediction. It doesn't take into account the qualification scores, but are sorted from highest individual CCWM to lowest:

Rank	Team #	Q Points
1	67	14
2	71	14
3	971	12
4	40	12
5	25	12
6	418	12
7	1318	12
8	179	12
9	1676	12
10	45	10
11	870	10
12	1717	10
13	716	10
14	1332	10
15	151	10
16	987	10
17	111	10
18	359	10
19	1745	10
20	1923	10
21	708	10
22	1710	10
23	2214	10
24	1208	10
25	1902	10
26	226	10
27	1941	10
28	281	10

I don't put much faith in these numbers, but they are interesting, and thought I'd share.

[ginosoprano09]

Originally Posted by Jim Meyer

I combined the match schedule with the CCWM and generated the following ranking prediction. It doesn't take into account the qualification scores, but are sorted from highest individual CCWM to lowest:

Rank	Team #	Q Points
1	67	14
2	71	14
3	971	12
4	40	12
5	25	12
6	418	12
7	1318	12
8	179	12
9	1676	12
10	45	10
11	870	10
12	1717	10
13	716	10
14	1332	10
15	151	10
16	987	10
17	111	10
18	359	10
19	1745	10
20	1923	10
21	708	10
22	1710	10
23	2214	10
24	1208	10
25	1902	10
26	226	10
27	1941	10
28	281	10

I don't put much faith in these numbers, but they are interesting, and thought I'd share.

In my opinion,TechnoKats and Wildstang might end up ranking higher than Purple Haze...

[EricH]

Originally Posted by ginosoprano09

In my opinion,TechnoKats and Wildstang might end up ranking higher than Purple Haze...

They also have targets on their backs. Purple Haze has more of a target.

The better/more well-known you are, the more you are defended against. If you can play through it, you will do well. But if you can't, well, that's life.

[ginosoprano09]

Originally Posted by EricH

The better/more well-known you are, the more you are defended against. If you can play through it, you will do well. But if you can't, well, that's life.

Yup, that happened at Lone Star when everyone thought that the Robowranglers and Purple Haze were going to win their second regional (they won Dallas) together, but since 148 had an AMAZING robot and 418 was seeded first, numerous teams developed strategies particularly for them; completely jeopardizing their chances of winning.

[PaulBartomioli]

Where would I find the address for the podcast of Galileo?

I want to watch the Newton Field as well. Team 1511, Rolling Thunder, has a family connection. Where would I find the podcast address for that field?

TY

[EricH]

Originally Posted by PaulBartomioli

Where would I find the address for the podcast of Galileo?

I want to watch the Newton Field as well. Team 1511, Rolling Thunder, has a family connection. Where would I find the podcast address for that field?

TY

The webcasts have several locations you can watch. http://gameday.mttkllr.com/ picks up all the feeds, so you can watch both Galileo and Newton (and Archimedes and Curie and Einstein) simultaneously. Then you can debate the action with whoever else happens to be in the chatroom. The site also gets rankings and match results from FIRST.

The feeds themselves are at http://science.ksc.nasa.gov/robotics/