|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Hopefully, with time, we'll look back on this and say that somehow (although we may not see it now) this is for the better. Hopefully. Or, if it turns out that this wasn't for the better, hopefully FIRST will realize this and change the rules again (and give us all something new to whine about
). It seems like it's all trial and error. We all complained about the 4 vs 0 thing, and it looks like FIRST is not going to do that again. It wasn't for the best. Hopefully it'll work out. ~Christina |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Uniform rules and enforcers? | Ben Mitchell | General Forum | 31 | 12-01-2005 20:55 |
| Dilemma - Letter of the rules v. spirit of the rules | Natchez | General Forum | 27 | 03-04-2003 15:37 |
| Time for new rules! | archiver | 2001 | 11 | 24-06-2002 02:01 |
| Have You read the rules? | RonP | General Forum | 0 | 21-01-2002 17:55 |
| Robot electrical systems rules | Morgan Jones | Rules/Strategy | 5 | 06-01-2002 00:50 |