|
|
|
 Our robotics lab has been closed for two days, TWO DAYS! :ahh: - Kevin Selavko [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating: 
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
| Our robotics lab has been closed for two days, TWO DAYS! :ahh: - Kevin Selavko [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#2
15-05-2009, 16:29
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FTC]: Full Field vs Low-cost Field
Well...it really depends year to year. In any particular case, having 100% of the field never gives a team a strategic advantage over the other, but having essential parts of the field made can be helpful.
Take this past year for example, the racks and the central scoring area were really important to be able to test on and work with. My team built without either one and then we had to spend hours at practice facility making adjustments. As far as buying a full field is concerned, I think that having an official might be mentally comforting, but I'm not sure if it makes a big difference as far as performance is concerned. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [FTC]: Email Blast: FIELD MANAGEMENT FORMAT FOR FTC WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP | PhilBot | FIRST Tech Challenge | 18 | 29-03-2009 21:04 |
| pic: FTC "Quad Quandary" low-cost field at CT kickoff event | KathieK | Extra Discussion | 5 | 24-09-2007 16:19 |
| Full Field | bradford86 | Inventor | 7 | 12-03-2005 10:25 |
| Low Cost Field BOM | Andy Brockway | General Forum | 161 | 11-01-2004 08:34 |
| Looking for full playing field | archiver | 2001 | 1 | 24-06-2002 00:13 |
Threaded Mode