|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Did Lunacy really level the playing field?
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Did Lunacy really level the playing field?
In no situation was I referring to a two on one. You are correct, if they play it right two robots will be able to pin another robot for a whole match. However, now it's their third robot against your two alliance partners. It will not usually be a winning strategy to double pin any robot, unless it is a qualifying match where there is clearly only one scoring robot on a particular alliance.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Did Lunacy really level the playing field?
But if you have two robots on one, then you have two robots able to score versus one scorer, with two completely free targets to get hit by HPs and robots, there's a bit of risk and reward to that strategy. 2 on 1 pins were rarely beneficial for an alliance, unless each alliance basically only had one good scorer.
Shaun beat me to it. |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Did Lunacy really level the playing field?
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Lunacy playing field. | Captain banana | General Forum | 2 | 10-01-2009 18:31 |
| See the playing field in 3D | Glasses | General Forum | 2 | 20-06-2005 20:57 |
| Metal can touch the playing field surface. | Madison | Rules/Strategy | 3 | 02-03-2003 00:31 |
| Building the Playing Field | AJ Quick | General Forum | 15 | 13-01-2003 19:15 |
| Equal Playing Level? | archiver | 1999 | 1 | 23-06-2002 21:51 |