|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Failed attempt to explain JAG linearity
Nice App! I'll take you to Strange Brew - much better beer than Milly's.
In my mind, there were two possible reasons for all of this: 1) Longer periods widen the gap between mean current and rms current. 2) Longer periods force the inductor to "run dry". The "dry" period affects the effective duty cycle. My interpretation of your app supports #2, but not #1. I just ran the simulation at 1kHz. I think this frequency shows the problem most clearly. You can clearly see ramp up, ramp down, and dwell. As you dither around that frequency, the ratio between those three sections does not remain constant. This means that the effective duty cycle is chop-frequency dependent. These results match perfectly with text-book buck regulator design principles. And really, what is an H-bridge other than a buck-boost regulator arguing with itself? I'm convinced that I could teach my students without any (ok, much ) hand waving. I still think it would be a great topic for a white paper.For LabVIEW-less Al - His code wraps the following in a code block. You can stick it into language-of-your-choice. Spoiler for code:
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2009 Camera and Jag inventor models problem | Creator Mat | CAD | 5 | 08-03-2009 14:05 |
| 1 Jag and 1 Victor not responding correctly. | elbuo | NI LabVIEW | 4 | 17-02-2009 22:57 |
| Joystick Linearity | NinJA999 | Control System | 4 | 28-01-2007 18:49 |
| pic: Yet another attempt at Photoshop | Cody Carey | Extra Discussion | 1 | 08-04-2006 23:13 |
| pic: Failed attempt at simulation | CD47-Bot | Extra Discussion | 5 | 17-06-2004 11:03 |