|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Five weeks instead of six??
My coach said that build season next year will only be five weeks instead of six weeks. Do you think that will have an impact on the quality of the robots in next years game? Personally, I do not think that one less week will make that much of a problem as people think it will be (this is coming from reactions I have personally seen). What does everyone else think?
Last edited by delsaner : 02-06-2009 at 09:00. Reason: Changing-of-words |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Five weeks instead of six??
"Word is" usually mean it's an unsubstantiated rumor.
I don't think teams will have time to perfect their bots with iterative designs, which may lead to more frustration in the veteran teams that are used to it. Once less week would, imo, also bring a huge time crunch on the logistics of acquiring parts, lead time for maching, welding, powder coating, etc. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Five weeks instead of six??
they wont make it less than 6 weeks. if they do Ill eat a pig . . snout to hoof .
all off this speculation is comming from a posted day on the georga dome's website, and the location of the first saturday of 2010. some how people add up all the regional weeks and the spaces between championship and build season Some one then came up as 5 for the magic number of the build. . . FIRST will skim from the in between regional/championship weeks before they shorten a build season ( if im wrong see the previous pig statement) |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Five weeks instead of six??
GDC, if you are out there, all I want for Christmas is to see Stuart eat a pig snout to hoof.
|
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Five weeks instead of six??
I would ask your coach where he got this information. FIRST has not made any official announcements on the subject.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Five weeks instead of six??
Quote:
GDC if for no other reason than this don't make the build season 5 weeks! Also, unsubstantiated rumor is unsubstantiated. Would it be cool to change things up? Sure, would it be practical? Not really, all it would mean would be I am getting sick in 5 weeks instead of 6, not MUCH of a difference.Last edited by Andrew Schreiber : 02-06-2009 at 09:56. |
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Five weeks instead of six??
With the withholding allowance this past year build season never ended for some anyway, so who knows if it would really even matter. Speculation is a funny thing and is rarely worth our time, but I must admit the snout to hoof challenge has me interested. OINK, OINK, BURP?
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Five weeks instead of six??
One thing to think about when listening to and contributing to rumors, is to consider those who are impacted by them in really awful ways. Teams in Brazil and England, just to name a couple of areas where FRC teams are located, have a difficult enough time as it is without talk of shortening the 6 weeks build. Teams who have the luxury of attending kickoffs and picking up their KoPs at the site location to begin planning and building immediately, may just take that capability for granted. Teams in remote locations do not always have that opportunity and have to work within the constraints that are created by their shortened build time. I would wager that if the build time of 6 weeks were shortened any further, these teams would be further pressed for time in ways many teams have not experienced and don't even think about. Not fun.
Last edited by JaneYoung : 02-06-2009 at 12:06. |
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Five weeks instead of six??
Form what I heard, from my coach and other, is that build season will be five weeks instead of six. I heard it was because of the positioning of Kick-off, that kickoff may have to be pushed back a week, shortening build season. I'm not saying that this rumor is true, i am just curious about what the results could be if this rumor is true.
|
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Five weeks instead of six??
Quote:
![]() |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Five weeks instead of six??
Well, the results are already showing that some mentors will pig out, some will make really bad puns, and others will turn into Eeyores. Actually, that's pretty normal for build season predictions.
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Five weeks instead of six??
Stay away from 1902 please =P We dont wanna be eaten hahaha
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Five weeks instead of six??
Quote:
Second free advice is to wait until November to start the silly bets. I'd suggest the summer to hone your CAD skills, September for programming and then use October for working on welding and machining techniques. November for snouts. Oh yea, baked vs. fried if you have a choice. |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Five weeks instead of six??
omg...
I can't see any reason for this!!! I think that if the FIRST reduces the season time to five weeks, teams of other countries won't participate. Every year, we always work with just 4 weeks, because in the first week we don't have de KoP and the last week is reserved for export of the robot to USA. So I really can't imagine how build a robot in just three weeks. Whatever... |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Five weeks instead of six??
Quote:
The effects of less than 6 weeks may not be cool for foreign teams. But if it was just a fun way of limiting our time even more, I'd say bring it. (Only for the US though maybe? I'd like to see it happen).By the way...I love the punny mentors on CD. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FIRSTcast: Season 4 Episode 6 - Five weeks to go | Jeff Rodriguez | General Forum | 3 | 11-01-2009 22:33 |
| A Breakdown of the Six Weeks for Rookies | Wayne C. | General Forum | 10 | 13-01-2005 18:21 |
| Why Six Weeks? | Gabriel | General Forum | 20 | 22-02-2004 23:18 |
| How did YOU drive your team nuts these six weeks? | archiver | 2001 | 10 | 24-06-2002 01:13 |
| An idea for the 2000 games..(is six weeks enough?) | archiver | 1999 | 18 | 23-06-2002 23:17 |