Go to Post There is no right or wrong way to do this. - nuggetsyl [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > ChiefDelphi.com Website > Extra Discussion
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 16-06-2009, 22:36
Aren_Hill's Avatar
Aren_Hill Aren_Hill is offline
Build Nifty Things
no team
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Menlo Park CA
Posts: 1,218
Aren_Hill has a reputation beyond reputeAren_Hill has a reputation beyond reputeAren_Hill has a reputation beyond reputeAren_Hill has a reputation beyond reputeAren_Hill has a reputation beyond reputeAren_Hill has a reputation beyond reputeAren_Hill has a reputation beyond reputeAren_Hill has a reputation beyond reputeAren_Hill has a reputation beyond reputeAren_Hill has a reputation beyond reputeAren_Hill has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: Swerve Module Concept (View 1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel_LaFleur View Post
Both designs have tradeoffs and their use truely depends on design intent.

Since I'm of the pro ring design, I'll put forth what I see as it's biggest pros and cons:

Pro: Less stress on the whole module -- with the ring low (near the ground) you have a significantly shorter lever arm and therefore much lower stress (see above post). This will allow you to make your side plates thinner (and lighter) while increasing their robustness.

Con: More framework. The frame must contact the module at 2 rings that are not close to each other. That means more framework and possibly a heavier chassis.


Ring designs tend to have less ground clearance as well, but with the side gear that low in your design I don't see that as much of an issue.


If anyone else would like to chime in, I'd like to hear y'alls opinion as well.
The "ring" can be put at any height you want really so ground clearance is very tweakable.

And building a frame to go with the "ring style" using 1x1x.0625 box tubing works very well weight wise as opposed to pure top mounting which would require heftier frame members
__________________
A guy who likes robots.
1625->3928->148->1296->971 oh dear
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
pic: FRC-34 2009 Swerve Module w/CIM (Front View) Ed Sparks Extra Discussion 10 05-05-2009 07:13
pic: FRC-34 2009 Swerve Module w/FP (Side View) Ed Sparks Extra Discussion 6 09-03-2009 14:02
pic: stangs swerve module Aren_Hill Extra Discussion 8 23-04-2007 08:15
pic: Swerve! (Module) =Martin=Taylor= Extra Discussion 13 09-07-2006 19:57


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 17:29.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi