|
|
|
 OMG, yet another blatant attempt by FIRST at being open and transparent! What is this place coming to?? :p - DonRotolo [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| OMG, yet another blatant attempt by FIRST at being open and transparent! What is this place coming to?? :p - DonRotolo [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#3
02-09-2009, 22:05
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Swerve Question
It all really depends what road your taking, if you take the route we have (supporting the top and bottom) 6061 should be just fine, if you go 118's route with no bottom support then your sideplates may warrant 7075.
It really all depends on what you have 148 went with the fork style and i dont think they used 7075 (john hop in anytime) |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Swerve Comments | Team1710 | Technical Discussion | 16 | 10-03-2009 18:24 |
| Swerve Drivetrain | Pelicano234 | Technical Discussion | 18 | 13-05-2007 12:55 |
| Swerve Module Question | adlai | Technical Discussion | 8 | 03-04-2007 21:20 |
| Swerve/Crab | Rob2713g | Technical Discussion | 5 | 12-11-2006 22:05 |
| A Swerve Drive Question | lndnny | Technical Discussion | 10 | 20-07-2006 08:09 |
Threaded Mode