|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
[FTC]: Building Low Cost Playing Field
Our team is new to FTC and trying to build the low cost playing field following the diagrams on the FIRST website.
http://www.usfirst.org/roboticsprogr...t.aspx?id=6654 I can't figure out how it's is suppose to be 12' (144"). There are 3 long pipes that are 43.5 inches. The T-connectors from our local hardware store are 2.75" total (with .75" overlap of pipe on each connection), so the additional length is actually 1.25" per T-connector. There are two 1.75" pieces at the ends that fit into 90d connectors. The 90d connectors don't add length to the inside of the playing field. Here are the numbers. 3 x 43.5 = 130.5 4 x 1.25 = 5 2 x 1.75 = 3.5 The total is 139" which is much shorter than the 1" variance on 144". Even if we add an extra T-connector to the center panel for the side reinforcement, the total is only 140.25". How do we create a 12' playing field? Should we be lengthening the small pieces (two 1.75") to get the correct length? Are the T-connectors we're using shorter than ones available in the US? Is it the inside of the playing field that should be 144"? Thanks. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FTC]: Building Low Cost Playing Field
The answer to the question is found in the FIRST Hot Shot! Q&A Forum (Post #7): forums.usfirst.org/showthread.php?t=12917
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [FTC]: Full Field vs Low-cost Field | 595294001 | FIRST Tech Challenge | 13 | 04-05-2011 19:10 |
| pic: FTC "Quad Quandary" low-cost field at CT kickoff event | KathieK | Extra Discussion | 5 | 24-09-2007 16:19 |
| Building your playing field....and how long it takes | shotgunking777 | General Forum | 19 | 17-01-2005 14:29 |
| Low Cost Field BOM | Andy Brockway | General Forum | 161 | 11-01-2004 08:34 |
| Building the Playing Field | AJ Quick | General Forum | 15 | 13-01-2003 19:15 |