|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Need for Inspections Rules Changes
I know Michigan had this http://www.firstinmichigan.org/filem...%20Rev%20D.pdf but i don't know what happened once the teams got to the districts. Perhaps someone could expand on this?
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Need for Inspections Rules Changes
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Need for Inspections Rules Changes
i think that something our team will initiate this year is a complete pre-inspection at our pre-ship event. We will build a sizing box and we already have a scale. We tried to do this last year and caught several problems from many of the rookie and veteran teams.... and helped them correct them. It was actually a lot of fun working with them...
Some teams (veteran ones..) balked at the inspection findings... so we just let them find out for themselves... the service was totally voluntary... Some type of pre-ship inspection service should be offered by veteran teams in their areas. We plan on taking ours "on the road" and using inspectors from our team and other teams that these same teams will be seeing at our local regional. Besides being good for teams.... this could also enhance the ability for an inspection team to come together before Thursday at the event. I think the "burden" in helping these rookie teams should be shouldered by the veteran teams...it is imperative this year that teams get to the events pretty much "ready to play". We can help this by being in more contact with rookie and teams with less resources than we have. I hope many veteran teams will take up this challenge.... Good luck to everyone and thank everyone for their comments regarding my initial comments and proposals.... keep them coming... GO FIRST |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Need for Inspections Rules Changes
Quote:
On another note, at the regional we attended last year, there just was not enough room set aside for the inspectors. The scale and sizing box were too close together making it difficult to move from the scale to the box without getting in the way of each other. The robots lined up at the scale and the size box often stretched down the aisle making it almost impossible to get to the nearby pits. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Need for Inspections Rules Changes
Bob,
Quote:
Quote:
More importantly, many teams would intentionally delay starting their inspections until Thursday matches have concluded. Why? Because they would run the risk of being prevented from competing if a problem is found. At issue here is that "most" rules have a basis in safety or in competitive advantage. We inspectors would now have a greater chance of being the "bad guys". Do we allow a known non-complying team to compete while their fellow teams continue just because they have not started inspection? I hope you see the potential problems... I really think that all teams must pass inspection before starting qualifying rounds if the field is to be level. Quote:
I see no difference between this and the "honor" system we have now that any changes made after inspection is completed (Friday and Saturday) is brought to the inspector's attention and the change is re-inspected. Like the Saturday re-inspection, I would add size, weight and a spot check or two to the MINI (for these teams) and let 'em go... Regards, Mike |
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Need for Inspections Rules Changes
Here are a few 'statistics' that seem to be normal for all regionals and even the Champs...
If you see a team before 10 o'clock in the inspection area, they have never weighed or sized the robot or they don't know where the practice cue is. Some teams will start to inspect after their second practice and either just before or just after lunch, starting about 11. Business picks up by 3PM and hits a peak by 4-5 o'clock. LRIs start visiting teams in the pit by 4 if they are following the recommended practice. By 6 o'clock, LRIs are instructed to start visiting the teams with a "mad mom face" and most of the stragglers will start to come in. It is way out of the ordinary for a team to not inspect on Thursday except for those that choose to go home early or come in late. By Friday morning, the majority of teams without a sticker are bringing in the BOM or signing the inspection sheet. An LRI takes it personally if all teams do not have a sticker by opening ceremonies. There is always at least one veteran team who waits until the last minute to inspect. There is always several teams who will completely tear down their robot on Thursday for any of a variety of reasons especially if it is their first regional. Rookies are not the only late comers nor are they always the greater number of the problem teams. There are some regionals each year that will report that a number of teams are not inspected or even started by Friday morning. (Not always the same regional) Inspections are complicated by changes in the KOP particularly the control system, issues arising from field control, and volunteers doing double duty, i.e. judges and refs inspecting on Thursday. Average inspection times run 20 minutes or less. Consistent 45 minute or longer inspections indicate an issue with the inspection team. Partial inspections take longer overall than a full, one visit, inspection. A request for a partial indicates the team is not ready to be inspected. The rule that allowed more practice matches for teams already inspected brought experienced teams in earlier for inspection, at some regionals. There are some teams that refuse help no matter how much you try. It takes a strong and forceful LRI to take matters in hand and layout a step by step approach to compliance. Teams will continue to modify and build throughout the weekend and won't think about reinspection. Inspection areas near the cue make things easier to see by those manning the inspection area on Friday and Saturday. Last edited by Al Skierkiewicz : 09-10-2009 at 08:14. |
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Need for Inspections Rules Changes
Quote:
Partial inspections have been done at every regional I've been to (especially with sizing and weight), but perhaps this needs to be clarified and changed this year. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Changes to rules mid-event? Rochester Regional | purduephotog | Rules/Strategy | 12 | 09-03-2009 18:08 |
| paper: 2006 IRI Rules Changes and Clarifications | Andy Baker | Extra Discussion | 1 | 23-07-2006 02:47 |
| Need Help: Simplified 2002 Rules suitable for Display | Mark Hamilton | General Forum | 2 | 08-12-2002 14:53 |
| Womens' Tournament Rules Changes | Mr. Mac | OCCRA | 7 | 01-12-2002 04:24 |
| FIRST inspections ( following rules ) | Caleb Osborne | General Forum | 31 | 26-07-2002 08:09 |