|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: [FTC]: Ducktape
Quote:
Feel free to take your foot out of your mouth next time you post. If EricH wished to be rude in his post, I'm sure there are more critical ways of saying "read the manual again." For example, if anyone wants to be rude, they could gladly say GRTd*M- go read the darn* manual. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: [FTC]: Ducktape
Fair enough. That was late night post that was not thought out or warranted. I apologize for feeling compelled to assume what I did. I've deleted the original post as it was garbage.
I agree with you EricH in your follow up comments. Let me rephrase what my original concern was that I wrongly felt compelled to inflame into an entirely irrelevant point. Wouldn't the first half suffice? Quote:
As you've posted thousands of times and have been on this forum for several years, I can imagine their is an initial frustration at those that do not do their "homework" before posting. And so maybe that's the point, to really turn the question back upon the poster to prevent a plethora of posts to which answers can be found without needing to waste time of those on the CD forum. So in conclusion, I apologize for me asinine post. Please excuse my brash comments as I was not thinking properly. -Ethan (trying to remove foot from mouth) |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FTC]: Ducktape
Sort of, it would have gotten the message of "read the manual" accrossed. But it really wouldn't answer the initial question.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: [FTC]: Ducktape
But wasn't find the solution in the manual, the point of EricH's post? To encourage the poster to read the manual to find the solution and not rely on members of the forum to answer his question for him.
TheIndian771 ultimately didn't need to read the manual because the answer was provided. So ultimately, Quote:
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FTC]: Ducktape
sorry this question has cause some many problems. We were just making sure that we didn't over look anything in the manual. We read the manual several times and just wanted to make sure we weren't missing something
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: [FTC]: Ducktape
I thought your question was perfectly reasonable. Have a great time doing robots!
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: [FTC]: Ducktape
Your question did not cause any problems. I caused the problem. I had fire in my belly and spit it out on this topic for which I apologize.
Unless compelled otherwise I think it best if this post fades into the past as I, for one, have more important things to focus on - transferring balls to and from our launcher to our hopper. Thanks for the redirection and all the support that happens on CD -Ethan |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FTC]: Ducktape
I actually thought you meant FTC team Duct Tape!! They are awesome and good friends of ours......whew, you had me worried
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [FTC]: Ducktape
Quote:
My first thought, glancing through the thread, was, of course Duct Tape is allowed -- we love going to competitions! ;-) (We just can't use duct tape, other than for decorations.) |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [FTC]: FTC Futures Forum at FTC World Championship | gdo | FIRST Tech Challenge | 0 | 08-04-2009 18:46 |
| [FTC]: FTC]: FTC Champ Tournament - Ontario (Scoring Breakdown) | Mr. Lim | FIRST Tech Challenge | 2 | 03-03-2008 11:54 |
| [FTC]: [FTC]: Ontario Provincial FTC Start/End Times | cbhl | FIRST Tech Challenge | 8 | 16-12-2007 13:37 |
| Ducktape Olympics | DarkRedDragon | Chit-Chat | 15 | 02-04-2003 15:39 |
| Quack, Quack!! Ducktape!! (and the game in general) | Jack | OCCRA | 2 | 19-09-2002 22:42 |